Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26248189›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Pharmacological Profile of Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ Receptors Interacting with G-Proteins and β-Arrestins 2.

D Malfacini, C Ambrosio, M C Gro', M Sbraccia, C Trapella, R Guerrini, M Bonora, P Pinton, T Costa, G Calo'

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Recommended Opioid Receptor Tool Compounds: ComparativeACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Biased Opioid Ligands.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  18. Managing Parkinson's disease: moving ON with NOP.British journal of pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D MalfaciniDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Pharmacology and National Institute of Neuroscience, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
C AmbrosioDepartment of Pharmacology, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
M C Gro'Department of Pharmacology, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
M SbracciaDepartment of Pharmacology, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
C TrapellaDepartment of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and LTTA, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
R GuerriniDepartment of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and LTTA, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
M BonoraDepartment of Morphology, Surgery, and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pathology, Oncology, and Experimental Biology and LTTA, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
P PintonDepartment of Morphology, Surgery, and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pathology, Oncology, and Experimental Biology and LTTA, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
T CostaDepartment of Pharmacology, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
G Calo'Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Pharmacology and National Institute of Neuroscience, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
University of Ferrara · ITIstituto Superiore di Sanità · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) controls several biological functions by selectively activating an opioid like receptor named N/OFQ peptide receptor (NOP). Biased agonism is emerging as an important and therapeutically relevant pharmacological concept in the field of G protein coupled receptors including opioids. To evaluate the relevance of this phenomenon in the NOP receptor, we used a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer technology to measure the interactions of the NOP receptor with either G proteins or β-arrestin 2 in the absence and in presence of increasing concentration of ligands. A large panel of receptor ligands was investigated by comparing their ability to promote or block NOP/G protein and NOP/arrestin interactions. In this study we report a systematic analysis of the functional selectivity of NOP receptor ligands. NOP/G protein interactions (investigated in cell membranes) allowed a precise estimation of both ligand potency and efficacy yielding data highly consistent with the known pharmacological profile of this receptor. The same panel of ligands displayed marked differences in the ability to promote NOP/β-arrestin 2 interactions (evaluated in whole cells). In particular, full agonists displayed a general lower potency and for some ligands an inverted rank order of potency was noted. Most partial agonists behaved as pure competitive antagonists of receptor/arrestin interaction. Antagonists displayed similar values of potency for NOP/Gβ1 or NOP/β-arrestin 2 interaction. Using N/OFQ as reference ligand we computed the bias factors of NOP ligands and a number of agonists with greater efficacy at G protein coupling were identified.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidArrestinsbeta-Arrestin 2beta-ArrestinsCell MembraneGTP-Binding ProteinsHumansLigandsNarcotic AntagonistsNociceptin ReceptorProtein BindingReceptors, OpioidAnalgesics, OpioidARRB2 protein, humanArrestinsbeta-Arrestin 2beta-ArrestinsGTP-Binding ProteinsLigandsNarcotic AntagonistsNociceptin ReceptorOPRL1 protein, humanReceptors, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID26248189
PMCPMC4527783
OpenAlexW2167841518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.