ArticleActa biomaterialia2015
A radiopaque electrospun scaffold for engineering fibrous musculoskeletal tissues: Scaffold characterization and in vivo applications.
Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Engineering Intervertebral Disc Regeneration: Biomaterials, Cell Sources and Animal Models.Cell proliferation · 2025Review
- Photo-Cross-Linkable Human Albumin Colloidal Gels Facilitate In Vivo Vascular Integration for Regenerative Medicine.ACS omega · 2021Article
- Three-Dimensional-Printed Flexible Scaffolds Have Tunable Biomimetic Mechanical Properties for Intervertebral Disc Tissue Engineering.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2021Article
- Rapid Fabrication of MgNHBiomedicines · 2021Article
- The porcine accessory carpal bone as a model for biologic joint replacement for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis.Acta biomaterialia · 2021Article
- Design Considerations to Facilitate Clinical Radiological Evaluation of Implantable Biomedical Structures.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2021Article
- Review
- Bioprinting of radiopaque constructs for tissue engineering and understanding degradation behavior by use of Micro-CT.Bioactive materials · 2020Article
- Restoration of physiologic loading modulates engineered intervertebral disc structure and function in an in vivo model.JOR spine · 2020Article
- Intervertebral Disc Diseases PART 2: A Review of the Current Diagnostic and Treatment Strategies for Intervertebral Disc Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- In Vivo Tracking of Tissue Engineered Constructs.Micromachines · 2019Review
- Current Concepts in Meniscus Tissue Engineering and Repair.Advanced healthcare materials · 2018Review
- Translation of an injectable triple-interpenetrating-network hydrogel for intervertebral disc regeneration in a goat model.Acta biomaterialia · 2017Article
- In vivo performance of an acellular disc-like angle ply structure (DAPS) for total disc replacement in a small animal model.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2017Article
- Current strategies for treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration: substitution and regeneration possibilities.Biomaterials research · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Tissue engineering strategies have emerged in response to the growing prevalence of chronic musculoskeletal conditions, with many of these regenerative methods currently being evaluated in translational animal models. Engineered replacements for fibrous tissues such as the meniscus, annulus fibrosus, tendons, and ligaments are subjected to challenging physiologic loads, and are difficult to track in vivo using standard techniques. The diagnosis and treatment of musculoskeletal conditions depends heavily on radiographic assessment, and a number of currently available implants utilize radiopaque markers to facilitate in vivo imaging. In this study, we developed a nanofibrous scaffold in which individual fibers included radiopaque nanoparticles. Inclusion of radiopaque particles increased the tensile modulus of the scaffold and imparted radiation attenuation within the range of cortical bone. When scaffolds were seeded with bovine mesenchymal stem cells in vitro, there was no change in cell proliferation and no evidence of promiscuous conversion to an osteogenic phenotype. Scaffolds were implanted ex vivo in a model of a meniscal tear in a bovine joint and in vivo in a model of total disc replacement in the rat coccygeal spine (tail), and were visualized via fluoroscopy and microcomputed tomography. In the disc replacement model, histological analysis at 4 weeks showed that the scaffold was biocompatible and supported the deposition of fibrous tissue in vivo. Nanofibrous scaffolds that include radiopaque nanoparticles provide a biocompatible template with sufficient radiopacity for in vivo visualization in both small and large animal models. This radiopacity may facilitate image-guided implantation and non-invasive long-term evaluation of scaffold location and performance. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The healing capacity of fibrous musculoskeletal tissues is limited, and injury or degeneration of these tissues compromises the standard of living of millions in the US. Tissue engineering repair strategies for the intervertebral disc, meniscus, tendon and ligament have progressed from in vitro to in vivo evaluation using a variety of animal models, and the clinical application of these technologies is imminent. The composition of most scaffold materials however does not allow for visualization by methods available to clinicians (e.g., radiography), and thus it is not possible to assess their performance in situ. In this work, we describe a radiopaque nanofibrous scaffold that can be visualized radiographically in both small and large animal models and serve as a framework for the development of an engineered fibrous tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.