Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26247885›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2015

Genomic landscape of salivary gland tumors.

Shumei Kato, Sheryl K Elkin, Maria Schwaederle, Brett N Tomson, Teresa Helsten, Jennifer L Carter, Razelle Kurzrock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Molecular Biology of MEC Salivary Gland Tumors.Annals of otolaryngology and rhinology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. NR4A3 Expression Is Consistently Absent in Acinic Cell Carcinomas of the Breast: A Potential Nosologic Shift.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. p53 Inhibits Bmi-1-driven Self-Renewal and Defines Salivary Gland Cancer Stemness.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Whole-Genome Sequencing of Common Salivary Gland Carcinomas: Subtype-Restricted and Shared Genetic Alterations.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shumei KatoDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Sheryl K ElkinN-of-One, Inc., Lexington, MA, USA.
Maria SchwaederleCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, UC San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Brett N TomsonN-of-One, Inc., Lexington, MA, USA.
Teresa HelstenCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, UC San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Jennifer L CarterN-of-One, Inc., Lexington, MA, USA.
Razelle KurzrockCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, UC San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective treatment options for advanced salivary gland tumors are lacking. To better understand these tumors, we report their genomic landscape. We studied the molecular aberrations in 117 patients with salivary gland tumors that were, on physician request, tested in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) laboratory (Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA) using next-generation sequencing (182 or 236 genes), and analyzed by N-of-One, Inc. (Lexington, MA). There were 354 total aberrations, with 240 distinct aberrations identified in this patient population. Only 10 individuals (8.5%) had a molecular portfolio that was identical to any other patient (with four different portfolios amongst the ten patients). The most common abnormalities involved the TP53 gene (36/117 [30.8% of patients]), cyclin pathway (CCND1, CDK4/6 or CDKN2A/B) (31/117 [26.5%]) and PI3K pathway (PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PTEN or AKT1/3) (28/117 [23.9%]). In multivariate analysis, statistically significant co-existing aberrations were observed as follows: TP53 and ERBB2 (p = 0.01), cyclin pathway and MDM2 (p = 0.03), and PI3K pathway and HRAS (p = 0.0001). We were able to identify possible cognate targeted therapies in most of the patients (107/117 [91.5%]), including FDA-approved drugs in 80/117 [68.4%]. In conclusion, salivary gland tumors were characterized by multiple distinct aberrations that mostly differed from patient to patient. Significant associations between aberrations in TP53 and ERBB2, the cyclin pathway and MDM2, and HRAS and the PI3K pathway were identified. Most patients had actionable alterations. These results provide a framework for tailored combinations of matched therapies.

Indexed as

DNA Mutational AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingGenome, HumanMutationAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorGene FrequencyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLogistic ModelsMultivariate AnalysisOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPatient SelectionPhenotypePrecision MedicineAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, Tumorgenomic landscapenext-generation sequencingpersonalized therapysalivary gland tumortargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID26247885
PMCPMC4694855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.