ArticleRadiology2015
Slip Interface Imaging Predicts Tumor-Brain Adhesion in Vestibular Schwannomas.
Article in Radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applications of elastography in operative neurosurgery: A systematic review.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2022Pooled it
- Reduced lumbar myofascial mobility in chronic low back pain quantified using MR elastography-based slip interface imaging.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Preoperative Prediction of Pituitary Adenoma Consistency Using Synthetic MRI and Virtual Magnetic Resonance Elastography.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Blood immune profiling predicts surgical anatomy and facial nerve outcome in Vestibular Schwannoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Mechanical instability as a signature of viscoelastic decoupling at the tumor-brain interface.Biomaterials advances · 2026Article
- Elasticity-guided tumor resection: applying biomechanical information to neurosurgical practice.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Review
- MR Elastography-Based Slip Interface Imaging for Assessment of Myofascial Interface Mobility in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Noninvasive mapping of shear strain predicts the anatomical distribution of mild traumatic brain injury.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- Repeatability of Magnetic Resonance Elastography-Derived Mechanical Parameters in Intracranial Meningiomas.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- MR elastography-based slip interface imaging (SII) for functional assessment of myofascial interfaces: A feasibility study.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Tumor biomechanical stiffness by magnetic resonance elastography predicts surgical outcomes and identifies biomarkers in vestibular schwannoma and meningioma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Strain concentration drives the anatomical distribution of injury in acute and chronic traumatic brain injury.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Wavelet MRE: Imaging propagating broadband acoustic waves with wavelet-based motion-encoding gradients.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- The value of radiographic features in predicting postoperative facial nerve function in vestibular schwannoma patients: A retrospective study and nomogram analysis.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
- Improved quantification of tumor adhesion in meningiomas using MR elastography-based slip interface imaging.PloS one · 2024Article
- The contributions of relative brain viscosity to brain function and health.Brain communications · 2024Review
- Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE) of Skull Base Tumours: A Review.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023Article
- Clinical studies of magnetic resonance elastography from 1995 to 2021: Scientometric and visualization analysis based on CiteSpace.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Brainstem hyperintensity in patients with vestibular schwannoma is associated with labyrinth signal on magnetic resonance imaging but not vestibulocochlear tests.The neuroradiology journal · 2021Article
- Harnessing brain waves: a review of brain magnetic resonance elastography for clinicians and scientists entering the field.The British journal of radiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo test the clinical feasibility and usefulness of slip interface imaging (SII) to identify and quantify the degree of tumor-brain adhesion in patients with vestibular schwannomas. MATERIALS AND
methodS With institutional review board approval and after obtaining written informed consent, SII examinations were performed in nine patients with vestibular schwannomas. During the SII acquisition, a low-amplitude mechanical vibration is applied to the head with a pillow-like device placed in the head coil and the resulting shear waves are imaged by using a phase-contrast pulse sequence with motion-encoding gradients synchronized with the applied vibration. Imaging was performed with a 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) system in less than 7 minutes. The acquired shear motion data were processed with two different algorithms (shear line analysis and calculation of octahedral shear strain [OSS]) to identify the degree of tumor-brain adhesion. Blinded to the SII results, neurosurgeons qualitatively assessed tumor adhesion at the time of tumor resection. Standard T2-weighted, fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA), and T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging were reviewed to identify the presence of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) clefts around the tumors. The performance of the use of the CSF cleft and SII to predict the degree of tumor adhesion was evaluated by using the κ coefficient and McNemar test.
resultsAmong the nine patients, SII agreed with the intraoperative assessment of the degree of tumor adhesion in eight patients (88.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 57%, 98%), with four of four, three of three, and one of two cases correctly predicted as no adhesion, partial adhesion, and complete adhesion, respectively. However, the T2-weighted, FIESTA, and T2-weighted FLAIR images that used the CSF cleft sign to predict adhesion agreed with surgical findings in only four cases (44.4% [four of nine]; 95% CI: 19%, 73%). The κ coefficients indicate good agreement (0.82 [95% CI: 0.5, 1]) for the SII prediction versus surgical findings, but only fair agreement (0.21 [95% CI: -0.21, 0.63]) between the CSF cleft prediction and surgical findings. However, the difference between the SII prediction and the CSF cleft prediction was not significant (P = .103; McNemar test), likely because of the small sample size in this study.
conclusionSII can be used to predict the degree of tumor-brain adhesion of vestibular schwannomas and may provide a method to improve preoperative planning and determination of surgical risk in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.