Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26247672›Full record

SynthesisClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2015

Operative versus nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: a meta-analysis based on current evidence.

Xin-Hua Wang, Wei-Jun Guo, A-Bing Li, Guang-Jun Cheng, Tao Lei, You-Ming Zhao

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Trends in and Factors Associated With Surgical Management for Closed Clavicle Fractures.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xin-Hua WangThe Second Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Wei-Jun GuoThe Second Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
A-Bing LiThe Second Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Guang-Jun ChengThe Second Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Tao LeiThe Second Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
You-Ming ZhaoThe Second Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Literature searches of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, LILACS, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data databases were performed from 1966 to September 2014. Only randomized and quasi-randomized controlled clinical trials comparing operative and nonoperative treatments for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures were included. Data collection and extraction, quality assessment, and data analyses were performed according to the Cochrane standards. Thirteen studies were considered in the meta-analysis. Constant scores and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores were improved in the operative fixation group at a follow up of one year or more. The nonunion and symptomatic malunion rates were significantly lower in the operative group. Additionally, the nonoperative group had a higher likelihood of neurological symptoms compared with the operative group. A significantly higher risk of complications was found in patients treated conservatively than in those who underwent operative fixation. However, when patients with nonunion and symptomatic malunion were excluded from the analysis, no significant differences in the complication rate were found. We concluded that based on the current clinical reports, operative treatment is superior to nonoperative treatment in the management of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. However, we do not support the routine use of primary operative fixation for all displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adults.

Indexed as

Bone NailsBone PlatesClavicleFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, BoneHumansMalePublication BiasRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26247672
PMCPMC4518819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.