Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26247570›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2015

Motivating first-time, group O blood donors to return: Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial of a post-donation telephone interview.

Janis L France, Christopher R France, Bruce W Carlson, Debra A Kessler, Mark Rebosa, Beth H Shaz, Katrala Madden, Patricia M Carey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Janis L FranceDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, OH USA. Electronic address: FranceJ@ohio.edu.
Christopher R FranceDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, OH USA.
Bruce W CarlsonDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, OH USA.
Debra A KesslerNew York Blood Center, New York, NY, USA.
Mark RebosaNew York Blood Center, New York, NY, USA.
Beth H ShazNew York Blood Center, New York, NY, USA.
Katrala MaddenHoxworth Blood Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Patricia M CareyHoxworth Blood Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Funding

Motivating Type O- Blood Donors to ReturnR56HL119180 · NHLBI · OHIO UNIVERSITY ATHENS · PI FRANCE, CHRISTOPHER R · 2014 to 2014
$665k
NHLBI NIH HHS R56 HL119180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

First-time blood donors are essential to the US donor pool, providing nearly a third of all donations. Unfortunately, there are a wide variety of obstacles to repeat donation and new donors are extremely difficult to retain. Because each donor experiences a unique set of deterrents, we developed a post-donation interview based on motivational interview principles in order to flexibly address individual barriers. The primary aim of this randomized clinical trial is to examine retention of first-time, group O blood donors who are randomly assigned to receive either a telephone-delivered interview with motivational and action planning components or a standard-of-care control call approximately six weeks after their donation. Measures of donation attitude, perceived behavioral control, intention, and motivational autonomy will be measured before and after the telephone contact using online surveys, and donation attempts will be tracked for one year using blood center donor databases. We hypothesize that, compared to controls, donors who receive the telephone interview will be more likely to make a donation attempt over the following year. In addition, we will examine possible mechanisms of action of the interview using key predictors of donation behavior as described by Self Determination Theory (i.e., motivational autonomy) and the Theory of Planned Behavior (i.e., attitude, perceived behavioral control, and intention). Results of this intervention may help to support a novel strategy to enhance retention of selected blood donors in an effort to better meet the nation's blood supply needs.

Indexed as

Blood donationClinical trialImplementation intentionMotivational interview

Identifiers

PMID26247570
PMCPMC4740279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.