Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26247311›Full record

SynthesisEpilepsy & behavior : E&B2015

Corpus callosotomy versus vagus nerve stimulation for atonic seizures and drop attacks: A systematic review.

John D Rolston, Dario J Englot, Doris D Wang, Paul A Garcia, Edward F Chang

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Atonic seizures in children: a meta-analysis comparing corpus callosotomy to vagus nerve stimulation.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The impact of vagus nerve stimulation on the most disabling seizures: A retrospective study in adults with drug-resistant epilepsy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Surgical Treatment of Drug-Resistant Generalized Epilepsy.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John D RolstonDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of CA, San Francisco, USA. Electronic address: john.rolston@ucsf.edu.
Dario J EnglotDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of CA, San Francisco, USA.
Doris D WangDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of CA, San Francisco, USA.
Paul A GarciaDepartment of Neurology, University of CA, San Francisco, USA.
Edward F ChangDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of CA, San Francisco, USA.
Neurological Surgery · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Resting-State Functional Connectivity Analysis in Focal Neocortical EpilepsyF32NS086353 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ENGLOT, DARIO J · 2014 to 2014
$59k
NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS086353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atonic seizures are debilitating and poorly controlled with antiepileptic medications. Two surgical options are primarily used to treat medically refractory atonic seizures: corpus callosotomy (CC) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). However, given the uncertainty regarding relative efficacy and surgical complications, the best approach for affected patients is unclear. The PubMed database was queried for all articles describing the treatment of atonic seizures and drop attacks with either corpus callosotomy or VNS. Rates of seizure freedom, >50% reduction in seizure frequency, and complications were compared across the two patient groups. Patients were significantly more likely to achieve a >50% reduction in seizure frequency with CC versus VNS (85.6% versus 57.6%; RR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1-2.1). Adverse events were more common with VNS, though typically mild (e.g., 22% hoarseness and voice changes), compared with CC, where the most common complication was the disconnection syndrome (13.2%). Both CC and VNS are well tolerated for the treatment of refractory atonic seizures. Existing studies suggest that CC is potentially more effective than VNS in reducing seizure frequency, though a direct study comparing these techniques is required before a definitive conclusion can be reached.

Indexed as

Corpus CallosumEpilepsy, GeneralizedHumansPsychosurgerySyncopeVagus Nerve StimulationAtonic seizuresCorpus callosotomyDrop attacksVagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID26247311
PMCPMC5261864
OpenAlexW1950387798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.