Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26247020›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2015

Biology of Bone Tissue: Structure, Function, and Factors That Influence Bone Cells.

Rinaldo Florencio-Silva, Gisela Rodrigues da Silva Sasso, Estela Sasso-Cerri, Manuel Jesus Simões, Paulo Sérgio Cerri

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 885 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
885citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
31.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

885 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,921 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

825 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rinaldo Florencio-SilvaDepartment of Morphology and Genetics, Laboratory of Histology and Structural Biology, Federal University of São Paulo, 04023-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Gisela Rodrigues da Silva SassoDepartment of Morphology and Genetics, Laboratory of Histology and Structural Biology, Federal University of São Paulo, 04023-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Estela Sasso-CerriDepartment of Morphology, Laboratory of Histology and Embryology, Dental School, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 14801-903 Araraquara, SP, Brazil.
Manuel Jesus SimõesDepartment of Morphology and Genetics, Laboratory of Histology and Structural Biology, Federal University of São Paulo, 04023-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Paulo Sérgio CerriDepartment of Morphology, Laboratory of Histology and Embryology, Dental School, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 14801-903 Araraquara, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone tissue is continuously remodeled through the concerted actions of bone cells, which include bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone formation by osteoblasts, whereas osteocytes act as mechanosensors and orchestrators of the bone remodeling process. This process is under the control of local (e.g., growth factors and cytokines) and systemic (e.g., calcitonin and estrogens) factors that all together contribute for bone homeostasis. An imbalance between bone resorption and formation can result in bone diseases including osteoporosis. Recently, it has been recognized that, during bone remodeling, there are an intricate communication among bone cells. For instance, the coupling from bone resorption to bone formation is achieved by interaction between osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Moreover, osteocytes produce factors that influence osteoblast and osteoclast activities, whereas osteocyte apoptosis is followed by osteoclastic bone resorption. The increasing knowledge about the structure and functions of bone cells contributed to a better understanding of bone biology. It has been suggested that there is a complex communication between bone cells and other organs, indicating the dynamic nature of bone tissue. In this review, we discuss the current data about the structure and functions of bone cells and the factors that influence bone remodeling.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone and BonesBone RemodelingCalcification, PhysiologicCell CommunicationHumansModels, BiologicalOsteoblastsOsteoclastsStructure-Activity Relationship

Identifiers

PMID26247020
PMCPMC4515490
OpenAlexW1594526962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.