Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26246866›Full record

ArticleThe annals of applied statistics

BAYESIAN SPARSE GRAPHICAL MODELS FOR CLASSIFICATION WITH APPLICATION TO PROTEIN EXPRESSION DATA.

Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani, Rajesh Talluri, Yuan Ji, Kevin R Coombes, Yiling Lu, Bryan T Hennessy, Michael A Davies, Bani K Mallick

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The annals of applied statistics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bayesian Transfer Learning.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bayesian Structure Learning in Multi-layered Genomic Networks.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Integration of Survival and Binary Data for Variable Selection and Prediction: A Bayesian Approach.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Veerabhadran BaladandayuthapaniThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.
Rajesh TalluriThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.
Yuan JiNorthShore University HealthSystem and University of Chicago.
Kevin R CoombesThe Ohio State University.
Yiling LuThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.
Bryan T HennessyBeaumont Hospital.
Michael A DaviesThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.
Bani K MallickTexas A&M University.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBeaumont Hospital, Dearborn · USMitchell Institute · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Bayesian models for cancer prognosis by integrating diverse types of dataR01CA132897 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI JI, YUAN, MUELLER, PETER · 2008 to 2019
$2.1M
Integrative methods for high-dimensional genomics dataR01CA160736 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BALADANDAYUTHAPANI, VEERABHADRAN · 2011 to 2014
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA132897NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) analysis is a powerful, relatively new platform that allows for high-throughput, quantitative analysis of protein networks. One of the challenges that currently limit the potential of this technology is the lack of methods that allow for accurate data modeling and identification of related networks and samples. Such models may improve the accuracy of biological sample classification based on patterns of protein network activation and provide insight into the distinct biological relationships underlying different types of cancer. Motivated by RPPA data, we propose a Bayesian sparse graphical modeling approach that uses selection priors on the conditional relationships in the presence of class information. The novelty of our Bayesian model lies in the ability to draw information from the network data as well as from the associated categorical outcome in a unified hierarchical model for classification. In addition, our method allows for intuitive integration of a priori network information directly in the model and allows for posterior inference on the network topologies both within and between classes. Applying our methodology to an RPPA data set generated from panels of human breast cancer and ovarian cancer cell lines, we demonstrate that the model is able to distinguish the different cancer cell types more accurately than several existing models and to identify differential regulation of components of a critical signaling network (the PI3K-AKT pathway) between these two types of cancer. This approach represents a powerful new tool that can be used to improve our understanding of protein networks in cancer.

Indexed as

Bayesian methodsgraphical modelsmixture modelsprotein signaling pathways

Identifiers

PMID26246866
PMCPMC4523298
OpenAlexW2028556122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.