Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26246804›Full record

ReviewGastroenterology research and practice2015

Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review.

Nikhil Lal, Sam Livemore, Declan Dunne, Iftikhar Khan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05039424 (A Randomized, Sham-controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05039424 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Sham-controlled Trial: Endoscopic Myotomy of the Pylorus To Improve Emptying and Symptoms (EMPTIES)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMatthew AllemangRan2022 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsGastroparesisArmsEndoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP), Diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) without pyloric disruption
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Gastric per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy for Refractory Gastroparesis: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [A New Paradigm in Diagnosing Functional Gastroduodenal Disorders: High-Resolution Electrogastrography].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Endoscopic Therapies for Gastroparesis.Current gastroenterology reports · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nikhil LalSchool of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE, UK.
Sam LivemoreSchool of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE, UK.
Declan DunneAintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK.
Iftikhar KhanAintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background. Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is a surgically implanted treatment option for refractory gastroparesis. Aim. To systematically appraise the current evidence for the use of gastric electrical stimulation and suggest a method of standardisation of assessment and follow-up in these patients. Methods. A systematic review of PubMed, Web of Science, DISCOVER, and Cochrane Library was conducted using the keywords including gastric electrical stimulation, gastroparesis, nausea, and vomiting and neuromodulation, stomach, central nervous system, gastric pacing, electrical stimulation, and gastrointestinal. Results. 1139 potentially relevant articles were identified, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria and were included. The quality of studies was variable. There was a variation in outcome measures and follow-up methodology. Included studies suggested significant reductions in symptom severity reporting over the study period, but improvements in gastric emptying time were variable and rarely correlated with symptom improvement. Conclusion. The evidence in support of gastric electrical stimulation is limited and heterogeneous in quality. While current evidence has shown a degree of efficacy in these patients, high-quality, large clinical trials are needed to establish the efficacy of this therapy and to identify the patients for whom this therapy is inappropriate. A consensus view on essential preoperative assessment and postoperative measurement is needed.

Identifiers

PMID26246804
PMCPMC4515290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.