Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26246540›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2016

Reaching the poor with health interventions: programme-incidence analysis of seven randomised trials of women's groups to reduce newborn mortality in Asia and Africa.

Tanja A J Houweling, Joanna Morrison, Glyn Alcock, Kishwar Azad, Sushmita Das, Munir Hossen, Abdul Kuddus, Sonia Lewycka, Caspar W Looman, Bharat Budhathoki Magar and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Tanja A J HouwelingInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joanna MorrisonInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Glyn AlcockInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Kishwar AzadPerinatal Care Project (PCP), Diabetic Association of Bangladesh (BADAS), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Sushmita DasSociety for Nutrition, Education and Health Action (SNEHA), Urban Health Centre, Shahunagar, Dharavi, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Munir HossenPerinatal Care Project (PCP), Diabetic Association of Bangladesh (BADAS), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Abdul KuddusPerinatal Care Project (PCP), Diabetic Association of Bangladesh (BADAS), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Sonia LewyckaInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Caspar W LoomanDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bharat Budhathoki MagarMother and Infant Research Activities (MIRA), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Dharma S ManandharMother and Infant Research Activities (MIRA), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Mahfuza AkterPerinatal Care Project (PCP), Diabetic Association of Bangladesh (BADAS), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Albert Lazarous Nkhata DubeMaiMwana Project, Mchinji, Malawi.
Shibanand RathEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India.
Naomi SavilleInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Aman SenMother and Infant Research Activities (MIRA), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Prasanta TripathyEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India.
Anthony CostelloInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
EquiNaM group

Funding

Wellcome Trust 085417MA/Z/08/ZWellcome Trust 091561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEfforts to end preventable newborn deaths will fail if the poor are not reached with effective interventions. To understand what works to reach vulnerable groups, we describe and explain the uptake of a highly effective community-based newborn health intervention across social strata in Asia and Africa.

methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of seven randomised trials of participatory women's groups to reduce newborn mortality in India, Bangladesh, Nepal and Malawi. We analysed data on 70,574 pregnancies. Socioeconomic and sociodemographic differences in group attendance were tested using logistic regression. Qualitative data were collected at each trial site (225 focus groups, 20 interviews) to understand our results.

resultsSocioeconomic differences in women's group attendance were small, except for occasional lower attendance by elites. Sociodemographic differences were large, with lower attendance by young primigravid women in African as well as in South Asian sites. The intervention was considered relevant and interesting to all socioeconomic groups. Local facilitators ensured inclusion of poorer women. Embarrassment and family constraints on movement outside the home restricted attendance among primigravid women. Reproductive health discussions were perceived as inappropriate for them.

conclusionsCommunity-based women's groups can help to reach every newborn with effective interventions. Equitable intervention uptake is enhanced when facilitators actively encourage all women to attend, organise meetings at the participants' convenience and use approaches that are easily understandable for the less educated. Focused efforts to include primigravid women are necessary, working with families and communities to decrease social taboos.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityInfant MortalityPovertyAdultAsia, WesternFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesMalawiPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSocioeconomic FactorsVulnerable PopulationsHEALTH BEHAVIOURHealth inequalitiesINTERNATIONAL HLTHNEONATALREPRODUCTIVE HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID26246540
PMCPMC4717375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.