Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26246501›Full record

ArticleHuman molecular genetics2015

Proteins linked to autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive disorders harbor characteristic rare missense mutation distribution patterns.

Tychele N Turner, Christopher Douville, Dewey Kim, Peter D Stenson, David N Cooper, Aravinda Chakravarti, Rachel Karchin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human molecular genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. HGG advances · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tychele N TurnerPredoctoral Training Program in Human Genetics and Molecular Biology, McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Center for Complex Disease Genomics.
Christopher DouvilleDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21210, USA and.
Dewey KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21210, USA and.
Peter D StensonInstitute of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK.
David N CooperInstitute of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK.
Aravinda ChakravartiCenter for Complex Disease Genomics.
Rachel KarchinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21210, USA and Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA, karchin@jhu.edu.

Funding

Predoctoral Training Program in Human GeneticsT32GM007814 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VALLE, DAVID · 1985 to 2021
$10.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007814
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of rare missense variants in disease causation remains difficult to interpret. We explore whether the clustering pattern of rare missense variants (MAF < 0.01) in a protein is associated with mode of inheritance. Mutations in genes associated with autosomal dominant (AD) conditions are known to result in either loss or gain of function, whereas mutations in genes associated with autosomal recessive (AR) conditions invariably result in loss-of-function. Loss-of-function mutations tend to be distributed uniformly along protein sequence, whereas gain-of-function mutations tend to localize to key regions. It has not previously been ascertained whether these patterns hold in general for rare missense mutations. We consider the extent to which rare missense variants are located within annotated protein domains and whether they form clusters, using a new unbiased method called CLUstering by Mutation Position. These approaches quantified a significant difference in clustering between AD and AR diseases. Proteins linked to AD diseases exhibited more clustering of rare missense mutations than those linked to AR diseases (Wilcoxon P = 5.7 × 10(-4), permutation P = 8.4 × 10(-4)). Rare missense mutation in proteins linked to either AD or AR diseases was more clustered than controls (1000G) (Wilcoxon P = 2.8 × 10(-15) for AD and P = 4.5 × 10(-4) for AR, permutation P = 3.1 × 10(-12) for AD and P = 0.03 for AR). The differences in clustering patterns persisted even after removal of the most prominent genes. Testing for such non-random patterns may reveal novel aspects of disease etiology in large sample studies.

Indexed as

Genes, DominantGenes, RecessiveMutation, MissenseComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGenetic Diseases, InbornGenome, HumanHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationMultigene FamilyProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID26246501
PMCPMC6354780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.