Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26246483›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2015

Quantitative Microplate-Based Growth Assay for Determination of Antifungal Susceptibility of Histoplasma capsulatum Yeasts.

Kristie D Goughenour, Joan-Miquel Balada-Llasat, Chad A Rappleye

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Genotypic diversity, virulence, and molecular genetic tools inMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Phenotypic characterization of cryptic species in the fungal pathogenbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Deletion of the Stress Response GeneJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Biofilm Formation byFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  20. Fungal species boundaries in the genomics era.Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristie D GoughenourDepartment of Microbiology, Department of Microbial Infection and Immunity, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Joan-Miquel Balada-LlasatDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Chad A RappleyeDepartment of Microbiology, Department of Microbial Infection and Immunity, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA rappleye.1@osu.edu.
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Target identification and structure optimization of novel thiazole antifungalsR21AI109437 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RAPPLEYE, CHAD A, TJARKS, WERNER · 2014 to 2015
$424k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI109437NIAID NIH HHS R21AI109437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standardized methodologies for determining the antifungal susceptibility of fungal pathogens is central to the clinical management of invasive fungal disease. Yeast-form fungi can be tested using broth macrodilution and microdilution assays. Reference procedures exist for Candida species and Cryptococcus yeasts; however, no standardized methods have been developed for testing the antifungal susceptibility of yeast forms of the dimorphic systemic fungal pathogens. For the dimorphic fungal pathogen Histoplasma capsulatum, susceptibility to echinocandins differs for the yeast and the filamentous forms, which highlights the need to employ Histoplasma yeasts, not hyphae, in antifungal susceptibility tests. To address this, we developed and optimized methodology for the 96-well microtiter plate-based measurement of Histoplasma yeast growth in vitro. Using optical density, the assay is quantitative for fungal growth with a dynamic range greater than 30-fold. Concentration and assay reaction time parameters were also optimized for colorimetric (MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] reduction) and fluorescent (resazurin reduction) indicators of fungal vitality. We employed this microtiter-based assay to determine the antifungal susceptibility patterns of multiple clinical isolates of Histoplasma representing different phylogenetic groups. This methodology fulfills a critical need for the ability to monitor the effectiveness of antifungals on Histoplasma yeasts, the morphological form present in mammalian hosts and, thus, the form most relevant to disease.

Indexed as

ColorimetryFluorometryHistoplasmaHistoplasmosisHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStaining and Labeling

Identifiers

PMID26246483
PMCPMC4572531
OpenAlexW1854797600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.