Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26246282›Full record

ArticleEmergency radiology2015

Safety incident reporting in emergency radiology: analysis of 1717 safety incident reports.

Mohammad Mansouri, Khalid W Shaqdan, Shima Aran, Ali S Raja, Michael H Lev, Hani H Abujudeh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammad MansouriDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Founders Building, Room 210, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. mmansouri1@partners.org.
Khalid W ShaqdanDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Founders Building, Room 210, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. kshaqdan@partners.org.
Shima AranDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Founders Building, Room 210, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. aran.shima@mgh.harvard.edu.
Ali S RajaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Founders Building, Suite 110, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. asraja@partners.org.
Michael H LevDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Founders Building, Room 210, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. mlev@mgh.harvard.edu.
Hani H AbujudehDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Founders Building, Room 210, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. Habujudeh@partners.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this article is to describe the incidence and types of safety reports logged in the radiology safety incident reporting system in our emergency radiology section over an 8-year period. Electronic incident reporting system of our institute was searched for the variables in emergency radiology. All reports from April 2006 to June 2014 were included and deindentified. The following event classifications were investigated in radiography, CT, and MRI modalities: diagnostic test orders, ID/documentation/consent, safety/security/conduct, service coordination, surgery/procedure, line/tube, fall, medication/IV safety, employee general incident, environment/equipment, adverse drug reaction, skin/tissue, and diagnosis/treatment. A total of 881,194 emergency radiology examinations were performed during the study period, 1717 (1717/881,194 = 0.19 %) of which resulted in safety reports. Reports were classified into 14 different categories, the most frequent of which were "diagnostic test orders" (481/1717 = 28 % total incident reports), "medication/IV safety" (302/1717 = 18 % total incident reports), and "service coordination" (204/1717 = 12 % total incident reports). X-ray had the highest report rate (873/1717 = 50 % total incident reports), followed by CT (604/1717 = 35 % total incident reports) and MRI (240/1717 = 14 % total incident reports). Forty-six percent of safety incidents (789/1717) caused no harm and did not reach the patient, 36 % (617/1717) caused no harm but reached the patient, 18 % (308/1717) caused temporary or minor harm/ damage, and less than 1 % caused permanent or major harm/ damage or death. Our study shows an overall safety incident report rate of 0.19 % in emergency radiology including radiography, CT, and MRI modalities. The most common safety incidents were diagnostic test orders, medication/IV safety, and service coordination.

Indexed as

EmergenciesRadiology Department, HospitalRisk ManagementFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleOccupational HealthPatient SafetyQuality ImprovementEmergency radiologyIncident reportIncident reporting systemQuality and safetyQuality improvementSafety incident reporting system

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.