Observational studyThe British journal of radiology2015
Computed tomographic pulmonary changes in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.
Observational study in The British journal of radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paranasal sinusitis at the initiation of chemotherapy is a risk factor for invasive fungal disease in children and adolescents with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
- Seasonal prevalence and characteristics of low-dose CT detected lung nodules in a general Dutch population.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate whether patients with a diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) show characteristic pulmonary changes on chest CT compared with a control group without sinusopathy.
methodsThis retrospective, observational study included patients with and without a diagnosis of CRS who underwent CT examination of the lungs between 2012 and 2014. Two radiologists, who were blinded for the presence of CRS, reviewed the scans for the presence of any abnormalities consensually. The χ(2) test was used for correlative analysis, with a significance level of 0.05.
resultsA total of 123 CT series (51.2% from male patients, mean age 41 ± 16 years) were reviewed, including those from 59 (48%) patients with a diagnosis of CRS. Patients with CRS were more likely than the control group to exhibit atelectasis, bronchiolectasis, centrilobular nodules and ground-glass opacities (all p < 0.05), with a significant predilection for middle lobe and lingular involvement observed (p < 0.001). Other abnormalities, such as bronchial wall thickening and air trapping, did not differ between groups.
conclusionAtelectatic changes, ground-glass opacities, bronchiolectasis and centrilobular nodules are the most frequent abnormalities associated with CRS, with peculiar middle lobe and lingular involvement observed on chest CT examinations. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: CRS is a frequent disorder that displays typical pulmonary changes at CT. The recognition of such findings can prevent patients with this condition from undergoing unnecessary investigations that might be based on the presence of the aforementioned radiological features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.