Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26246193›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Molecular and chemical dialogues in bacteria-protozoa interactions.

Chunxu Song, Mark Mazzola, Xu Cheng, Janina Oetjen, Theodore Alexandrov, Pieter Dorrestein, Jeramie Watrous, Menno van der Voort, Jos M Raaijmakers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Maize (Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Fungi in aquatic ecosystems.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Chunxu Song1] Laboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, the Netherlands [2] Microbial Ecology Department, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), 6708 PB Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Mark MazzolaUSDA-ARS, 1104 N. Western Ave., Wenatchee, Washington 98801.
Xu ChengLaboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Janina OetjenCenter for Industrial Mathematics, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Theodore Alexandrov1] MALDI Imaging Lab, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany [2] Center for Industrial Mathematics, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany [3] SCiLS GmbH, 28359 Bremen, Germany [4] Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California at San Diego , San Diego, California 92093, United States [5] Structural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Pieter DorresteinSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California at San Diego , San Diego, California 92093, United States.
Jeramie WatrousSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California at San Diego , San Diego, California 92093, United States.
Menno van der VoortLaboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Jos M Raaijmakers1] Laboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, the Netherlands [2] Microbial Ecology Department, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), 6708 PB Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLUniversity of Bremen · DEUniversity of Montana · USNetherlands Institute of Ecology · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protozoan predation of bacteria can significantly affect soil microbial community composition and ecosystem functioning. Bacteria possess diverse defense strategies to resist or evade protozoan predation. For soil-dwelling Pseudomonas species, several secondary metabolites were proposed to provide protection against different protozoan genera. By combining whole-genome transcriptome analyses with (live) imaging mass spectrometry (IMS), we observed multiple changes in the molecular and chemical dialogues between Pseudomonas fluorescens and the protist Naegleria americana. Lipopeptide (LP) biosynthesis was induced in Pseudomonas upon protozoan grazing and LP accumulation transitioned from homogeneous distributions across bacterial colonies to site-specific accumulation at the bacteria-protist interface. Also putrescine biosynthesis was upregulated in P. fluorescens upon predation. We demonstrated that putrescine induces protozoan trophozoite encystment and adversely affects cyst viability. This multifaceted study provides new insights in common and strain-specific responses in bacteria-protozoa interactions, including responses that contribute to bacterial survival in highly competitive soil and rhizosphere environments.

Indexed as

LipopeptidesNaegleriaPseudomonas fluorescensPutrescineTranscriptomeLipopeptidesPutrescine

Identifiers

PMID26246193
PMCPMC4542665
OpenAlexW1059158856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.