Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26246090›Full record

ReviewThe neuroradiology journal2015

Congenital basis of posterior fossa anomalies.

Claudia Cotes, Eliana Bonfante, Jillian Lazor, Siddharth Jadhav, Maria Caldas, Leonard Swischuk, Roy Riascos

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The neuroradiology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dandy-Walker syndrome: an updated literature review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia CotesDepartment of Radiology, and Pediatric Radiology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Eliana BonfanteDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Jillian LazorUniversity of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Siddharth JadhavTexas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Maria CaldasTexas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Leonard SwischukDepartment of Radiology, and Pediatric Radiology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Roy RiascosDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA riascosr@hotmail.com.
Texas Children's Hospital · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classification of posterior fossa congenital anomalies has been a controversial topic. Advances in genetics and imaging have allowed a better understanding of the embryologic development of these abnormalities. A new classification schema correlates the embryologic, morphologic, and genetic bases of these anomalies in order to better distinguish and describe them. Although they provide a better understanding of the clinical aspects and genetics of these disorders, it is crucial for the radiologist to be able to diagnose the congenital posterior fossa anomalies based on their morphology, since neuroimaging is usually the initial step when these disorders are suspected. We divide the most common posterior fossa congenital anomalies into two groups: 1) hindbrain malformations, including diseases with cerebellar or vermian agenesis, aplasia or hypoplasia and cystic posterior fossa anomalies; and 2) cranial vault malformations. In addition, we will review the embryologic development of the posterior fossa and, from the perspective of embryonic development, will describe the imaging appearance of congenital posterior fossa anomalies. Knowledge of the developmental bases of these malformations facilitates detection of the morphological changes identified on imaging, allowing accurate differentiation and diagnosis of congenital posterior fossa anomalies.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, MultipleArachnoid CystsArnold-Chiari MalformationCerebellar DiseasesCerebellumCranial Fossa, PosteriorDandy-Walker SyndromeEye AbnormalitiesHamartoma Syndrome, MultipleHumansKidney Diseases, CysticMesencephalonRetinaRhombencephalonWalker-Warburg Syndromecongenital posterior fossa abnormalitiesdevelopment posterior fossaembryology posterior fossaimaging posterior fossaPosterior fossa anomalies

Identifiers

PMID26246090
PMCPMC4757284
OpenAlexW2132764089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.