ArticleNeurology2015
Risk factors for poor visual outcome in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
Article in Neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.
- European headache federation guideline on idiopathic intracranial hypertension.The journal of headache and pain · 2018Guideline
- Visual Field Outcomes for the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial (IIHTT).Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2016Trial
- Current Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Neuro-Ophthalmic Imaging: A Narrative Approach.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prediction of Poor Visual Outcomes at Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Diagnosis Using a Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm.Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2025Article
- Patterns of Retinal Damage and Visual Long-Term Consequences in Patients With Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.Neurology · 2025Article
- Rising consultations for suspected papilledema: clinical and neuro-ophthalmologic insights.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Fulminant Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension-Clinical Characteristics and Continuous Drainage as a Novel Treatment Approach.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Longitudinal visual outcomes in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: the role of early prognostic indicators and risk stratification in disease management.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Factors associated with vision loss in idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients with severe papilledema.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- A rare case of vision loss caused by leptomeningeal metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Visual prognosis in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: observations from a retrospective cohort in Germany.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Systemic Medications and Their Ocular Side Effects.Cureus · 2024Review
- The role of acetazolamide in critical care and emergency medicine.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2024Article
- An interdisciplinary integrated specialized one-stop outpatient clinic for idiopathic intracranial hypertension-a comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Progress and recognition of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A narrative review.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Review
- Advantages and Pitfalls of the Use of Optical Coherence Tomography for Papilledema.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024Review
- Classifying and quantifying changes in papilloedema using machine learning.BMJ neurology open · 2024Article
- Predicting the Rapid Improvement of Papilledema After Stenting in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.Clinical neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Extent of transverse sinus stenosis does not predict visual outcomes in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.Eye (London, England) · 2022Article
- Update on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Management.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDetermine potential risk factors for progressive visual field loss in the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial, a randomized placebo-controlled trial of acetazolamide in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and mild visual loss concurrently receiving a low sodium, weight reduction diet.
methodsLogistic regression and classification tree analyses were used to evaluate potential risk factors for protocol-defined treatment failure (>2 dB perimetric mean deviation [PMD] change in patients with baseline PMD -2 to -3.5 dB or >3 dB PMD change with baseline PMD -3.5 to -7 dB).
resultsSeven participants (6 on diet plus placebo) met criteria for treatment failure. The odds ratio for patients with grades III to V papilledema vs those with grades I and II was 8.66 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.65-∞, p = 0.025). A 1-unit decrease in the number of letters correct on the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) chart at baseline was associated with an increase in the odds of treatment failure by a factor of 1.16 (95% CI 1.04-1.30, p = 0.005). Compared with female participants, the odds ratio for male participants was 26.21 (95% CI 1.61-433.00, p = 0.02). The odds of treatment failure were 10.59 times higher (95% CI 1.63-116.83, p = 0.010) for patients with >30 transient visual obscurations per month vs those with ≤30 per month.
conclusionsMale patients, those with high-grade papilledema, and those with decreased visual acuity at baseline were more likely to experience treatment failure. All but one of these patients were treated with diet alone. These patients should be monitored closely and be considered for aggressive treatment of their idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.