ReviewIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2016
Culture as a Moving Symbolic Border.
Review in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research on consumers' purchase intention of cultural and creative products-Metaphor design based on traditional cultural symbols.PloS one · 2024Article
- Creativity and Fiction: Interpretative Horizons on the Emergence of the New in the Relationship Between Individual and Culture.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2021Article
- Once More about Boesch's Ontological Predication in Focus.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2017Article
- Psychological Functions of Semiotic Borders in Sense-Making: Liminality of Narrative Processes.Europe's journal of psychology · 2017Article
- Ernst E. Boesch's Ontologic Predication in Focus.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2016Review
- A Philosophical vs. a Psychological Perspective on Borders.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to propose the notion of culture as a symbolic moving border. Departing from both, Boesch's (1991) concept of culture as a symbolic field of action, and Herbst's (1995) co-genetic logic, I will discuss the dynamics of self-other relationships in terms of their potentiality as sources of movement in culture. A brief analysis of an empirical material is given in illustrative character of the ideas here exposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26245862What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.