Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26245832›Full record

ArticleGenetics2015

High-Resolution Global Analysis of the Influences of Bas1 and Ino4 Transcription Factors on Meiotic DNA Break Distributions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Xuan Zhu, Scott Keeney

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Exo1 recruits Cdc5 polo kinase to MutLγ to ensure efficient meiotic crossover formation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xuan ZhuMolecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065 Weill Graduate School of Medical Sciences of Cornell University, New York, New York 10065.
Scott KeeneyMolecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065 Weill Graduate School of Medical Sciences of Cornell University, New York, New York 10065 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065 s-keeney@ski.mskcc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1283-6417
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Mechanism of meiotic recombination in yeastR01GM058673 · NIGMS · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI KEENEY, SCOTT · 1999 to 2015
$6.0M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiotic recombination initiates with DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) made by Spo11. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, many DSBs occur in "hotspots" coinciding with nucleosome-depleted gene promoters. Transcription factors (TFs) stimulate DSB formation in some hotspots, but TF roles are complex and variable between locations. Until now, available data for TF effects on global DSB patterns were of low spatial resolution and confined to a single TF. Here, we examine at high resolution the contributions of two TFs to genome-wide DSB distributions: Bas1, which was known to regulate DSB activity at some loci, and Ino4, for which some binding sites were known to be within strong DSB hotspots. We examined fine-scale DSB distributions in TF mutant strains by deep sequencing oligonucleotides that remain covalently bound to Spo11 as a byproduct of DSB formation, mapped Bas1 and Ino4 binding sites in meiotic cells, evaluated chromatin structure around DSB hotspots, and measured changes in global messenger RNA levels. Our findings show that binding of these TFs has essentially no predictive power for DSB hotspot activity and definitively support the hypothesis that TF control of DSB numbers is context dependent and frequently indirect. TFs often affected the fine-scale distributions of DSBs within hotspots, and when seen, these effects paralleled effects on local chromatin structure. In contrast, changes in DSB frequencies in hotspots did not correlate with quantitative measures of chromatin accessibility, histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation, or transcript levels. We also ruled out hotspot competition as a major source of indirect TF effects on DSB distributions. Thus, counter to prevailing models, roles of these TFs on DSB hotspot strength cannot be simply explained via chromatin "openness," histone modification, or compensatory interactions between adjacent hotspots.

Indexed as

Binding SitesChromatinChromosomes, FungalDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedEndodeoxyribonucleasesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHistonesHomologous RecombinationMeiosisMeiotic Recombination Protein SPO11MutationRNA, MessengerSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsBAS1 protein, S cerevisiaeChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsEndodeoxyribonucleasesHistonesINO4 protein, S cerevisiaeMeiotic Recombination Protein SPO11RNA, MessengerSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSpo11 protein, S cerevisiaeTrans-ActivatorsTranscription Factorschromatindouble-strand breakmeiotic recombinationSpo11transcription factor

Identifiers

PMID26245832
PMCPMC4596667
OpenAlexW2258104352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.