ArticleGenetics2015
High-Resolution Global Analysis of the Influences of Bas1 and Ino4 Transcription Factors on Meiotic DNA Break Distributions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Article in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Separable downmodulation of meiotic axis protein deposition and DNA break induction at chromosome ends.eLife · 2026Article
- RPA directly stimulates Mer3 helicase processivity to ensure normal crossover formation in meiosis.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Distinct chromatin regulators downmodulate meiotic axis formation and DNA break induction at chromosome ends.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Temperature regulates negative supercoils to modulate meiotic crossovers and chromosome organization.Science China. Life sciences · 2024Article
- Meiosis in budding yeast.Genetics · 2023Article
- A graph neural network-based interpretable framework reveals a novel DNA fragility-associated chromatin structural unit.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Two pathways drive meiotic chromosome axis assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Molecular mechanisms for environmentally induced and evolutionarily rapid redistribution (plasticity) of meiotic recombination.Genetics · 2022Article
- Redirecting meiotic DNA break hotspot determinant proteins alters localized spatial control of DNA break formation and repair.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- The Zip4 protein directly couples meiotic crossover formation to synaptonemal complex assembly.Genes & development · 2022Article
- Article
- The Pif1 helicase is actively inhibited during meiotic recombination which restrains gene conversion tract length.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Exo1 recruits Cdc5 polo kinase to MutLγ to ensure efficient meiotic crossover formation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Chromosome-autonomous feedback down-regulates meiotic DNA break competence upon synaptonemal complex formation.Genes & development · 2020Article
- A dCas9-Based System Identifies a Central Role for Ctf19 in Kinetochore-Derived Suppression of Meiotic Recombination.Genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- Topoisomerases Modulate the Timing of Meiotic DNA Breakage and Chromosome Morphogenesis inGenetics · 2020Article
- Diverse DNA Sequence Motifs Activate Meiotic Recombination Hotspots Through a Common Chromatin Remodeling Pathway.Genetics · 2019Article
- A nucleotide resolution map of Top2-linked DNA breaks in the yeast and human genome.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Advances Towards How Meiotic Recombination Is Initiated: A Comparative View and Perspectives for Plant Meiosis Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Meiotic recombination initiates with DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) made by Spo11. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, many DSBs occur in "hotspots" coinciding with nucleosome-depleted gene promoters. Transcription factors (TFs) stimulate DSB formation in some hotspots, but TF roles are complex and variable between locations. Until now, available data for TF effects on global DSB patterns were of low spatial resolution and confined to a single TF. Here, we examine at high resolution the contributions of two TFs to genome-wide DSB distributions: Bas1, which was known to regulate DSB activity at some loci, and Ino4, for which some binding sites were known to be within strong DSB hotspots. We examined fine-scale DSB distributions in TF mutant strains by deep sequencing oligonucleotides that remain covalently bound to Spo11 as a byproduct of DSB formation, mapped Bas1 and Ino4 binding sites in meiotic cells, evaluated chromatin structure around DSB hotspots, and measured changes in global messenger RNA levels. Our findings show that binding of these TFs has essentially no predictive power for DSB hotspot activity and definitively support the hypothesis that TF control of DSB numbers is context dependent and frequently indirect. TFs often affected the fine-scale distributions of DSBs within hotspots, and when seen, these effects paralleled effects on local chromatin structure. In contrast, changes in DSB frequencies in hotspots did not correlate with quantitative measures of chromatin accessibility, histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation, or transcript levels. We also ruled out hotspot competition as a major source of indirect TF effects on DSB distributions. Thus, counter to prevailing models, roles of these TFs on DSB hotspot strength cannot be simply explained via chromatin "openness," histone modification, or compensatory interactions between adjacent hotspots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.