Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26245831›Full record

ArticleGenetics2015

Conservation of Regional Variation in Sex-Specific Sex Chromosome Regulation.

Alison E Wright, Fabian Zimmer, Peter W Harrison, Judith E Mank

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alison E WrightDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom alison.e.wright@ucl.ac.uk.
Fabian ZimmerDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Peter W HarrisonDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Judith E MankDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0900747 91070Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 090532/Z09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regional variation in sex-specific gene regulation has been observed across sex chromosomes in a range of animals and is often a function of sex chromosome age. The avian Z chromosome exhibits substantial regional variation in sex-specific regulation, where older regions show elevated levels of male-biased expression. Distinct sex-specific regulation also has been observed across the male hypermethylated (MHM) region, which has been suggested to be a region of nascent dosage compensation. Intriguingly, MHM region regulatory features have not been observed in distantly related avian species despite the hypothesis that it is situated within the oldest region of the avian Z chromosome and is therefore orthologous across most birds. This situation contrasts with the conservation of other aspects of regional variation in gene expression observed on the avian sex chromosomes but could be the result of sampling bias. We sampled taxa across the Galloanserae, an avian clade spanning 90 million years, to test whether regional variation in sex-specific gene regulation across the Z chromosome is conserved. We show that the MHM region is conserved across a large portion of the avian phylogeny, together with other sex-specific regulatory features of the avian Z chromosome. Our results from multiple lines of evidence suggest that the sex-specific expression pattern of the MHM region is not consistent with nascent dosage compensation.

Indexed as

Dosage Compensation, GeneticEvolution, MolecularAnimalsChickensDNA MethylationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMaleSex Chromosomesmale hypermethylated regionsex-biased gene expression

Identifiers

PMID26245831
PMCPMC4596671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.