Trial reportBMC women's health2015
Cluster randomized controlled trial protocol: addressing reproductive coercion in health settings (ARCHES).
Trial report in BMC women's health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01459458 (Family Planning-based Partner Abuse Intervention to Reduce Unintended Pregnancy), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Family Planning-based Partner Abuse Intervention to Reduce Unintended Pregnancy
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Women's experiences and expectations of intimate partner abuse identification in healthcare settings: a qualitative evidence synthesis.BMJ open · 2022Pooled it
- Training healthcare providers to respond to intimate partner violence against women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Effects of a clinic-based reproductive empowerment intervention on proximal outcomes of contraceptive use, self-efficacy, attitudes, and awareness and use of survivor services: a cluster-controlled trial in Nairobi, Kenya.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2023Trial
- Trauma-Informed Personalized Scripts to Address Partner Violence and Reproductive Coercion: Follow-Up Findings from an Implementation Randomized Controlled Trial Study.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2021Trial
- Effect of a Community-Based Gender Norms Program on Sexual Violence Perpetration by Adolescent Boys and Young Men: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2020Trial
- Cluster Randomized Trial of a College Health Center Sexual Violence Intervention.American journal of preventive medicine · 2020Trial
- Male Adolescents' Gender Attitudes and Violence: Implications for Youth Violence Prevention.American journal of preventive medicine · 2020Trial
- Trauma-Informed Personalized Scripts to Address Partner Violence and Reproductive Coercion: Preliminary Findings from an Implementation Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2019Trial
- Implementation of a Family Planning Clinic-Based Partner Violence and Reproductive Coercion Intervention: Provider and Patient Perspectives.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2017Trial
- Psychometric properties and refinement of the Reproductive Coercion Scale.Contraception · 2017Trial
- A family planning clinic-based intervention to address reproductive coercion: a cluster randomized controlled trial.Contraception · 2016Trial
- Correlates of reproductive coercion among college women in abusive relationships: baseline data from the college safety study.Journal of American college health : J of ACHTrial
- Postpartum integration of infant vaccines and contraception through gender transformative programming: A cluster randomized trial in India.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Strategies to address reproductive coercion and intimate partner violence in Nairobi family planning services: qualitative client and provider perspectives.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- Women and health workers' conceptualisations of reproductive coercion and abuse: a comparative synthesis from Brazil, Nepal, Palestine, and Sri Lanka.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Nonresponse to Health-Related Social Needs Screening Items Within Pediatric Primary Care.Pediatrics · 2025Article
- Strengthening Kenya's public health response to reproductive coercion and intimate partner violence in family planning clinics: applying the FRAME + IS approach.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Article
- Experiences of Domestic Violence in Adult Patients with Brain Injury: A Select Overview of Screening, Reporting, and Next Steps.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Birth Control Sabotage Motivation and Measurement: A Mixed-Methods Analysis among Latina Women.Violence against women · 2024Article
- Gender and Sexual Orientation Differences in Sexual Violence Knowledge, Prevention Behaviors, and Care-Seeking Behaviors.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWomen ages 16-29 utilizing family planning clinics for medical services experience higher rates of intimate partner violence (IPV) and reproductive coercion (RC) than their same-age peers, increasing risk for unintended pregnancy and related poor reproductive health outcomes. Brief interventions integrated into routine family planning care have shown promise in reducing risk for RC, but longer-term intervention effects on partner violence victimization, RC, and unintended pregnancy have not been examined. METHODS/
designThe 'Addressing Reproductive Coercion in Health Settings (ARCHES)' Intervention Study is a cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a brief, clinician-delivered universal education and counseling intervention to reduce IPV, RC and unintended pregnancy compared to standard-of-care in family planning clinic settings. The ARCHES intervention was refined based on formative research. Twenty five family planning clinics were randomized (in 17 clusters) to either a three hour training for all family planning clinic staff on how to deliver the ARCHES intervention or to a standard-of-care control condition. All women ages 16-29 seeking care in these family planning clinics were eligible to participate. Consenting clients use laptop computers to answer survey questions immediately prior to their clinic visit, a brief exit survey immediately after the clinic visit, a first follow up survey 12-20 weeks after the baseline visit (T2), and a final survey 12 months after the baseline (T3). Medical record chart review provides additional data about IPV and RC assessment and disclosure, sexual and reproductive health diagnoses, and health care utilization. Of 4009 women approached and determined to be eligible based on age (16-29 years old), 3687 (92 % participation) completed the baseline survey and were included in the sample. DISCUSSION: The ARCHES Intervention Study is a community-partnered study designed to provide arigorous assessment of the short (3-4 months) and long-term (12 months) effects of a brief, clinician-delivered universal education and counseling intervention to reduce IPC, RC and unintended pregnancy in family planning clinic settings. The trial features a cluster randomized controlled trial design, a comprehensive data collection schedule and a large sample size with excellent retention.
trial registrationClinicialTrials.gov NCT01459458. Registered 10 October 2011.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.