Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26245710›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2016

Content validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) items in the context of HIV clinical care.

Todd C Edwards, Rob J Fredericksen, Heidi M Crane, Paul K Crane, Mari M Kitahata, William C Mathews, Kenneth H Mayer, Leo S Morales, Michael J Mugavero, Rosa Solorio and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Many ways to skin a cat: psychometric methods options illustrated.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Todd C EdwardsDepartment of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, 1208 NE 43rd St., Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. toddce@uw.edu.
Rob J FredericksenHarborview Madison Clinic, School of Medicine, University of Washington, 325 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
Heidi M CraneHarborview Madison Clinic, School of Medicine, University of Washington, 325 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
Paul K CraneHarborview Madison Clinic, School of Medicine, University of Washington, 325 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
Mari M KitahataHarborview Madison Clinic, School of Medicine, University of Washington, 325 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
William C MathewsOwen Clinic, University of California - San Diego, 4168 Front St, San Diego, CA, 92103, USA.
Kenneth H MayerThe Fenway Institute, School of Public Health, Harvard University, 1340 Boylston Street, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Leo S MoralesDepartment of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, 1208 NE 43rd St., Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Michael J Mugavero1917 Clinic, University of Alabama - Birmingham, 908 20th Street S, Suite 250, Birmingham, AL, 35205, USA.
Rosa SolorioDepartment of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, 1208 NE 43rd St., Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Frances M YangGeorgia Regents University, 1459 Laney Walker Blvd, Augusta, GA, 30901, USA.
Donald L PatrickDepartment of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, 1208 NE 43rd St., Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
University of Washington · USHarborview Medical Center · USAugusta University · USHarvard University · US

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Kenneth Sherr · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
Unsolicited R24 for the CFAR-Network of Integrated Clinical Sciences, CNICSR24AI067039 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Michael S. Saag · 2006 to 2026
$99.4M
Patient reported outcomes in routine clinical care of patients infected with HIVU01AR057954 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CRANE, HEIDI M., CRANE, PAUL K · 2009 to 2013
$7.8M
3/4 Alcohol Research Consortium in HIV - Epidemiological Research Arm (ARCH-ERA)U01AA020793 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CRANE, HEIDI M., LAU, BRYAN · 2011 to 2020
$5.8M
Integration of Evidence-based Alcohol Interventions into HIV CareU01AA020802 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CROPSEY, KAREN L, MUGAVERO, MICHAEL J · 2011 to 2020
$4.2M
1/4 Alcohol Research Consortium in HIV-Administrative Core (ARCH-AC)U24AA020801 · NIAAA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHANDER, GEETANJALI, MCCAUL, MARY E · 2011 to 2021
$3.5M
Optimal assessment of HAART adherence in routine clinical careR01MH084759 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CRANE, HEIDI M. · 2008 to 2012
$2.9M
NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA020793NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA020802NIAAA NIH HHS U24 AA020801NIAAA NIH HHS U24AA020801NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIAID NIH HHS R24 AI067039NIAID NIH HHS R24AI067039NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR057954NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess content validity and patient and provider prioritization of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression, anxiety, fatigue, and alcohol use items in the context of clinical care for people living with HIV (PLWH), and to develop and assess new items as needed.

methodsWe conducted concept elicitation interviews (n = 161), item pool matching, prioritization focus groups (n = 227 participants), and cognitive interviews (n = 48) with English-speaking (~75 %) and Spanish-speaking (~25 %) PLWH from clinical sites in Seattle, San Diego, Birmingham, and Boston. For each domain we also conducted item review and prioritization with two HIV provider panels of 3-8 members each.

resultsAmong items most highly prioritized by PLWH and providers were those that included information regarding personal impacts of the concept being assessed, in addition to severity level. Items that addressed impact were considered most actionable for clinical care. We developed additional items addressing this. For depression we developed items related to suicide and other forms of self-harm, and for all domains we developed items addressing impacts PLWH and/or providers indicated were particularly relevant to clinical care. Across the 4 domains, 16 new items were retained for further psychometric testing.

conclusionPLWH and providers had priorities for what they believed providers should know to provide optimal care for PLWH. Incorporation of these priorities into clinical assessments used in clinical care of PLWH may facilitate patient-centered care.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePatient Outcome AssessmentPsychometricsQuality of LifeYoung AdultClinical practiceHIVPatient-centered outcomesPROMIS

Identifiers

PMID26245710
PMCPMC4724250
OpenAlexW1057650062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.