Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26245709›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2016

Is the Oswestry Disability Index a valid measure of response to sacroiliac joint treatment?

Anne G Copay, Daniel J Cher

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03122119 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Ultrasound Guided Platelet Rich Plasma Injections in the Sacroiliac Joint to Relieve Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorStar Spine and SportRan2017 to 2022Enrolled51ConditionsChronic Low Back Pain, Sacroiliitis, Sacroiliac, BackacheArmsPlatelet Rich Plasma Joint Injection
NCT05347589 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Post Isometric Relaxation of Quadratus Lumborum With and Without Gluteus Maximus Activation on Pain, Disability and Pelvic Tilt Angle in Patients With Innominate Upslip Suprapubic Dysfunction

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled30ConditionsInnominate Upslip Suprapubic DysfunctionArmsPost isometric relaxation of quadratus lumborum and gluteus Gluteus maximus activation exercises, post isometric relaxation of the Quadratus lumborum
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2017
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Comparison of anterolateral versus posterior lumbar fusion techniques in obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A retrospective cohort review of BMI on SI joint fusion outcomes: examining the evidence to improve insurance guidelines.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anne G CopaySPIRITT Research, 12977 North Forty Drive, Suite 200, St. Louis, MO, 63141, USA. acopay@spirittresearch.com.
Daniel J CherSI-BONE, Inc., San Jose, CA, 95128, USA.
SI-Bone (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDisease-specific measures of the impact of sacroiliac (SI) joint pain on back/pelvis function are not available. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a validated functional measure for lower back pain, but its responsiveness to SI joint treatment has yet to be established. We sought to assess the validity of ODI to capture disability caused by SI joint pain and the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) after SI joint treatment.

methodsPatients (n = 155) participating in a prospective clinical trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion underwent baseline and follow-up assessments using ODI, visual analog scale (VAS) pain assessment, Short Form 36 (SF-36), EuroQoL-5D, and questions (at follow-up only) regarding satisfaction with the SI joint fusion and whether the patient would have the fusion surgery again. All outcomes were compared from baseline to 12 months postsurgery. The health transition item of the SF-36 and the satisfaction scale were used as external anchors to calculate MCID. MCID was estimated for ODI using four calculation methods: (1) minimum detectable change, (2) average ODI change of patients' subsets, (3) change difference between patients' subsets, and (4) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

resultsAfter SI fusion, patients improved significantly (p < .0001) on all measures: SI joint pain (48.8 points), ODI (23.8 points), EQ-5D (0.29 points), EQ-5D VAS (11.7 points), PCS (8.9 points), and MCS (9.2 points). The improvement in ODI was significantly correlated (p < .0001) with SI joint pain improvement (r = .48) and with the two external anchors: SF-36 health transition item (r = .49) and satisfaction level (r = .34). The MCID values calculated for ODI using the various methods ranged from 3.5 to 19.5 points. The ODI minimum detectable change was 15.5 with the health transition item as the anchor and 13.5 with the satisfaction scale as the anchor.

conclusionsODI is a valid measure of change in SI joint health. Hence, researchers and clinicians may rely on ODI scores to measure disability caused by SI pain. We estimated the MCID for ODI to be 13-15 points, which falls within the range of that previously reported for lumbar back pain and indicates that an improvement in disability should be at least 15 % to be beyond random variation.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresQuality of LifeSacroiliac JointTreatment OutcomeMinimally invasive surgeryMinimum clinically important differencePatient-reported outcomesSacroiliac joint fusion

Identifiers

PMID26245709
PMCPMC4722083
OpenAlexW1821663824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.