Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26245497›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

Should clinicians always administer dexamethasone beyond 24 h after chemotherapy to control delayed nausea and vomiting caused by moderately emetogenic regimens? Insight from the re-evaluation of two randomized studies.

Luigi Celio, Erminio Bonizzoni, Filippo De Braud, Francesco Agustoni, Matti Aapro

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. One shot NEPA plus dexamethasone to prevent multiple-day chemotherapy in sarcoma patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Controlling chemotherapy-induced nausea requires further improvement: symptom experience and risk factors among Korean patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Luigi CelioMedical Oncology Unit 1, Fondazione IRCCS "Istituto Nazionale Tumori", Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy. luigi.celio@istitutotumori.mi.it.
Erminio BonizzoniSection of Medical Statistics and Biometry, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Filippo De BraudMedical Oncology Unit 1, Fondazione IRCCS "Istituto Nazionale Tumori", Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Francesco AgustoniMedical Oncology Unit 1, Fondazione IRCCS "Istituto Nazionale Tumori", Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Matti AaproMultidisciplinary Oncology Institute, Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITClinique de Genolier · CHUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeData from two noninferiority trials of a dexamethasone-sparing regimen were assessed for the impact of acute nausea and vomiting on delayed outcome in patients undergoing moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) or anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC).

methodsChemo-naive patients were randomized to receive palonosetron (0.25 mg IV) plus dexamethasone (8 mg IV) on day 1 of chemotherapy, or the same regimen followed by oral dexamethasone on days 2 and 3 in the MEC (n = 237) and AC (n = 380) cohorts. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not they experienced vomiting and/or moderate-to-severe nausea during the acute phase (high- and low-risk groups, respectively). Primary efficacy endpoint was the complete protection (CP) against delayed vomiting and moderate-to-severe nausea. Patient's satisfaction (0-100 mm visual analog scale) was also analyzed.

resultsAmong the 209 low-risk patients undergoing MEC, delayed CP occurred in 82.9% of those who received single-dose dexamethasone and 89.8% of those who received 3-day dexamethasone (P = 0.165). Of the 271 low-risk patients undergoing AC, CP was achieved in 71.7 % of those treated with single-dose dexamethasone and 84.2% treated with 3-day dexamethasone (P = 0.019). In spite of these observations, the patient satisfaction data was not influenced by dexamethasone regimen. In both cohorts, occurrence of acute vomiting or moderate-to-severe nausea was the key independent-predictor for delayed vomiting or nausea, respectively.

conclusionsThe dexamethasone-sparing regimen provides adequate delayed protection in patients undergoing MEC who are at low risk for delayed symptoms, and can still be discussed for low-risk AC patients as the daily difference in control is modest. Additional dexamethasone doses can be customized on the basis of occurrence or absence of acute symptoms in the first cycle of MEC and even AC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntiemeticsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalCohort StudiesDexamethasoneFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNauseaTime FactorsVomitingAntiemeticsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalDexamethasoneACDelayed CINVDexamethasoneMECPalonosetron

Identifiers

PMID26245497
PMCPMC4729784
OpenAlexW2153694704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.