ReviewAfrican journal of primary health care & family medicine2014
Health sector responses to intimate partner violence: a literature review.
Review in African journal of primary health care & family medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations and factors shaping how they work: a systematic review of reviews.BMC public health · 2021Pooled it
- Medical mesocosms and cohort differences in victim decisions in spousal violence in Sub-Saharan Africa.Frontiers in sociology · 2025Article
- Article
- The association of intimate partner violence and contraceptive use: a multi-country analysis of demographic and health surveys.International journal for equity in health · 2023Article
- Improving the mental health of women intimate partner violence survivors: Findings from a realist review of psychosocial interventions.PloS one · 2022Review
- Improving the quality of care for female rape survivors at Scottish Livingstone Hospital, Molepolole, Botswana: A quality improvement cycle.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2020Article
- Ethiopian Health Care Workers' Insights into and Responses to Intimate Partner Violence in Pregnancy-A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Determinants of intimate partner violence against women in Ethiopia: A multi-level analysis.PloS one · 2020Article
- Women's experience of intimate partner violence and uptake of Antenatal Care in Sofala, Mozambique.PloS one · 2019Article
- Interventions addressing men, masculinities and gender equality in sexual and reproductive health and rights: an evidence and gap map and systematic review of reviews.BMJ global health · 2019Article
- Expanding a primary prevention program to address sexual and gender-based violence among health sciences students in Ghana: A pilot study.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntimate partner violence (IPV) is a common and serious public health concern, particularly in South Africa, but it is not well managed in primary care.
aimThis review aims to summarise the current state of knowledge regarding health sector-based interventions for IPV, their integration into health systems and services and the perspectives of service users and healthcare workers on IPV care, focusing on the South African context.
methodPubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Google Scholar were searched between January 2012 and May 2014. All types of study design were included, critically appraised and summarised.
resultsExposure to IPV leads to wide-ranging and serious health effects. There is sufficient evidence that intervening in IPV in primary care can improve outcomes. Women who have experienced IPV have described an appropriate response by healthcare providers to be non-judgmental, understanding and empathetic. IPV interventions that are complex, comprehensive and utilise systems-wide approaches have been most effective, but system- and society-level barriers hamper implementation. Gender inequities should not be overlooked when responding to IPV.
conclusionFurther evaluations of health sector responses to IPV are needed, in order to assist health services to determine the most appropriate models of care, how these can be integrated into current systems and how they can be supported in managing IPV. The need for this research should not prevent health services and healthcare providers from implementing IPV care, but rather should guide the development of rigorous contextually-appropriate evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.