Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26245377›Full record

ArticleNature2015

Propagation of conformational changes during μ-opioid receptor activation.

Rémy Sounier, Camille Mas, Jan Steyaert, Toon Laeremans, Aashish Manglik, Weijiao Huang, Brian K Kobilka, Héléne Déméné, Sébastien Granier

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 149 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
149citing papers in PubMed
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

149 citing papers in PubMed, 256 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. From empirical screening to lipid trolling: the evolution of extrahelical allosteric modulators of AMedicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Activation dynamics of a water-soluble human mu-opioid receptor.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Structure-Bias Relationship of μ-Opioid Receptor Agonists.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

89 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rémy SounierInstitut de Genomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS UMR-5203 INSERM U1191, University of Montpellier, F-34000 Montpellier, France.
Camille MasInstitut de Genomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS UMR-5203 INSERM U1191, University of Montpellier, F-34000 Montpellier, France.
Jan SteyaertStructural Biology Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Toon LaeremansStructural Biology Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Aashish ManglikDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Weijiao HuangDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Brian K KobilkaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Héléne DéménéCentre de Biochimie Structurale, CNRS UMR 5048-INSERM 1054- University of Montpellier, 29 rue de Navacelles, 34090 Montpellier Cedex, France.
Sébastien GranierInstitut de Genomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS UMR-5203 INSERM U1191, University of Montpellier, F-34000 Montpellier, France.
Stanford University · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRVIB-VUB Center for Structural Biology · BEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

Molecular Biophysics Training Program at StanfordT32GM008294 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, KERWYN C. · 1989 to 2019
$7.4M
Structural Basis of Opioid Receptor FunctionR37DA036246 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KOBILKA, BRIAN K · 2013 to 2020
$4.2M
The structural basis for pathway-selective signaling by the µ opioid receptorR01DA036246 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Brian K Kobilka · 2024 to 2026
$1.6M
NIDA NIH HHS DA036246NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036246NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA036246NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

µ-Opioid receptors (µORs) are G-protein-coupled receptors that are activated by a structurally diverse spectrum of natural and synthetic agonists including endogenous endorphin peptides, morphine and methadone. The recent structures of the μOR in inactive and agonist-induced active states (Huang et al., ref. 2) provide snapshots of the receptor at the beginning and end of a signalling event, but little is known about the dynamic sequence of events that span these two states. Here we use solution-state NMR to examine the process of μOR activation using a purified receptor (mouse sequence) preparation in an amphiphile membrane-like environment. We obtain spectra of the μOR in the absence of ligand, and in the presence of the high-affinity agonist BU72 alone, or with BU72 and a G protein mimetic nanobody. Our results show that conformational changes in transmembrane segments 5 and 6 (TM5 and TM6), which are required for the full engagement of a G protein, are almost completely dependent on the presence of both the agonist and the G protein mimetic nanobody, revealing a weak allosteric coupling between the agonist-binding pocket and the G-protein-coupling interface (TM5 and TM6), similar to that observed for the β2-adrenergic receptor. Unexpectedly, in the presence of agonist alone, we find larger spectral changes involving intracellular loop 1 and helix 8 compared to changes in TM5 and TM6. These results suggest that one or both of these domains may play a role in the initial interaction with the G protein, and that TM5 and TM6 are only engaged later in the process of complex formation. The initial interactions between the G protein and intracellular loop 1 and/or helix 8 may be involved in G-protein coupling specificity, as has been suggested for other family A G-protein-coupled receptors.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationAnimalsBinding SitesHeterotrimeric GTP-Binding ProteinsLysineMiceModels, MolecularMorphinansNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationPyrrolesReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-2Receptors, Opioid, muSingle-Chain AntibodiesStructure-Activity RelationshipBU72 compoundHeterotrimeric GTP-Binding ProteinsLysineMorphinansPyrrolesReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-2Receptors, Opioid, muSingle-Chain Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID26245377
PMCPMC4820006
OpenAlexW1490029082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.