Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26245165›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2016

Can a Conical Implant Successfully Address Complex Anatomy in Primary THA? Radiographs and Hip Scores at Early Followup.

Quoqiang Zhang, Stuart B Goodman, William J Maloney, James I Huddleston

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of primary total hip arthroplasty with the revelation hip system using density mapping.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Total hip arthroplasty for dysplastic coxarthrosis using a cementless Wagner Cone stem.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Quoqiang ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, 450 Broadway Street, MC 6342, Redwood City, CA, 94063-6342, USA.
Stuart B GoodmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, 450 Broadway Street, MC 6342, Redwood City, CA, 94063-6342, USA.
William J MaloneyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, 450 Broadway Street, MC 6342, Redwood City, CA, 94063-6342, USA.
James I HuddlestonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, 450 Broadway Street, MC 6342, Redwood City, CA, 94063-6342, USA. jhuddleston@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with small or abnormal proximal femoral anatomy is challenging as a result of complex anatomic deformities in the hip. It is unclear which stem is the most appropriate for these patients. One possible implant design that may help meet this need is the modified Wagner Cone prosthesis, whose design consists of monoblock cone with splines; however, to our knowledge, no clinical results have been published using this implant. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We evaluated the hip scores and radiographic results (including signs of osseointegration and subsidence) of complex primary THA using the modified Wagner Cone cementless femoral component in patients with small or abnormal proximal femoral anatomic proportions.

methodsBetween 2006 and 2011, we performed 59 THAs on patients whose femoral geometry precluded the use of standard-sized implants. Of these, 49 (83%) received the modified Wagner Cone prosthesis. During this time, our indications for use of the Wagner Cone implant in such patients included: femoral neck retroversion, excessive anteversion of the femoral neck, or small proximal femora not suitable for standard implants. Of those, 40 patients with 49 THAs were available for radiographic and clinical followup at a minimum of 3 years, and no patients were lost to followup. The diagnosis included developmental dysplasia of hip (22 patients, 28 hips), secondary trauma or posttuberculosis osteoarthritis (nine patients, 10 hips), and hip disease secondary to other disorders (eight patients, nine hips) and osteonecrosis (one patients, two hips). Two versions of the stem with 135° (28 hips) or 125° (21 hips) neck angle versions were used to reestablish normal hip biomechanics. Version angle was chosen based on preoperative templating. Cementless cups with screws were used for the acetabulum. Mean followup was 4 years (range, 3-7 years). Study endpoints were the Harris hip score and radiographic evaluations by a surgeon not involved in the clinical care of the patients (QZ); radiographic analysis included evaluating for the presence or absence of signs of osseointegration (including Engh's criteria) and subsidence.

resultsThe Harris hip score improved from a mean of 41 ± 9 preoperatively to a mean of 85 ± 10 at last followup (p < 0.01). The mean vertical subsidence was 1.5 ± 1.1 mm. Radiographic evaluation demonstrated stability (no further subsidence) of all implants at last followup. Endosteal spot welds were found in 32 hips (65%). No progressive radiolucencies were observed. One patient (one hip) underwent revision surgery as a result of late infection; no other revisions were performed.

conclusionsThe modified Wagner Cone femoral stem has provided improvements in hip scores and promising short-term radiographic results at short-term followup in complex cementless THA associated with abnormal or small femoral anatomical proportions in which standard implants are inappropriate. Longer followup will be needed to see if these results endure. Randomized trials are needed to determine the optimal stem design for these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Indexed as

Hip ProsthesisAdultAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleFemurFollow-Up StudiesHip JointHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsseointegrationPostoperative ComplicationsPredictive Value of TestsProsthesis Design

Identifiers

PMID26245165
PMCPMC4709298
OpenAlexW2141756852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.