ArticleBiophysical journal2015
Relative Cosolute Size Influences the Kinetics of Protein-Protein Interactions.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combined Pulsed Electron Double Resonance EPR and Molecular Dynamics Investigations of Calmodulin Suggest Effects of Crowding Agents on Protein Structures.Biochemistry · 2022Article
- Cosolute modulation of protein oligomerization reactions in the homeostatic timescale.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- Features of molecular recognition of intrinsically disordered proteins via coupled folding and binding.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2019Review
- Brownian Dynamics Simulations of Biological Molecules.Trends in chemistry · 2019Article
- An optimized strategy to measure protein stability highlights differences between cold and hot unfolded states.Nature communications · 2017Article
- Molecular Effects of Concentrated Solutes on Protein Hydration, Dynamics, and Electrostatics.Biophysical journal · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein signaling occurs in crowded intracellular environments, and while high concentrations of macromolecules are postulated to modulate protein-protein interactions, analysis of their impact at each step of the reaction pathway has not been systematically addressed. Potential cosolute-induced alterations in target association are particularly important for a signaling molecule like calmodulin (CaM), where competition among >300 targets governs which pathways are selectively activated. To explore how high concentrations of cosolutes influence CaM-target affinity and kinetics, we methodically investigated each step of the CaM-target binding mechanism under crowded or osmolyte-rich environments mimicked by ficoll-70, dextran-10, and sucrose. All cosolutes stabilized compact conformers of CaM and modulated association kinetics by affecting diffusion and rates of conformational change; however, the results showed that differently sized molecules had variable effects to enhance or impede unique steps of the association pathway. On- and off-rates were modulated by all cosolutes in a compensatory fashion, producing little change in steady-state affinity. From this work insights were gained on how high concentrations of inert crowding agents and osmolytes fit into a kinetic framework to describe protein-protein interactions relevant for cellular signaling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.