Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26244729›Full record

ReviewBiophysical journal2015

Controlled One-on-One Encounters between Immune Cells and Microbes Reveal Mechanisms of Phagocytosis.

Volkmar Heinrich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Podosomes and Mechanical Force.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Micropipette-based biomechanical nanotools on living cells.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Dynamics ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Volkmar HeinrichDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, California. Electronic address: vheinrich@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

Integrative Experimental and Theoretical Studies of the Mechanics of PhagocytosisR01AI072391 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HEINRICH, VOLKMAR · 2007 to 2011
$1.8M
Cytoskeletal Membrane Anchors: Key Switchboards for Cellular Communication, MechaR01GM098060 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HEINRICH, VOLKMAR · 2012 to 2015
$1.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI072391NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among many challenges facing the battle against infectious disease, one quandary stands out. On the one hand, it is often unclear how well animal models and cell lines mimic human immune behavior. On the other hand, many core methods of cell and molecular biology cannot be applied to human subjects. For example, the profound susceptibility of neutropenic patients to infection marks neutrophils (the most abundant white blood cells in humans) as vital immune defenders. Yet because these cells cannot be cultured or genetically manipulated, there are gaps in our understanding of the behavior of human neutrophils. Here, we discuss an alternative, interdisciplinary strategy to dissect fundamental mechanisms of immune-cell interactions with bacteria and fungi. We show how biophysical analyses of single-live-cell/single-target encounters are revealing universal principles of immune-cell phagocytosis, while also dispelling misconceptions about the minimum required mechanistic determinants of this process.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsPhagocytosisAnimalsBacteriaCell MembraneHumansPhagocytes

Identifiers

PMID26244729
PMCPMC4572503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.