Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26244561›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Diversification of the Genus Anopheles and a Neotropical Clade from the Late Cretaceous.

Lucas A Freitas, Claudia A M Russo, Carolina M Voloch, Olívio C F Mutaquiha, Lucas P Marques, Carlos G Schrago

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Population genomics ofScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Phylogeny ofInsects · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. K-mer-Based Motif Analysis in Insect Species acrossComputational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucas A FreitasDepartamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Claudia A M RussoDepartamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Carolina M VolochDepartamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Olívio C F MutaquihaDepartamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Lucas P MarquesDepartamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Carlos G SchragoDepartamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Anopheles genus is a member of the Culicidae family and consists of approximately 460 recognized species. The genus is composed of 7 subgenera with diverse geographical distributions. Despite its huge medical importance, a consensus has not been reached on the phylogenetic relationships among Anopheles subgenera. We assembled a comprehensive dataset comprising the COI, COII and 5.8S rRNA genes and used maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference to estimate the phylogeny and divergence times of six out of the seven Anopheles subgenera. Our analysis reveals a monophyletic group composed of the three exclusively Neotropical subgenera, Stethomyia, Kerteszia and Nyssorhynchus, which began to diversify in the Late Cretaceous, at approximately 90 Ma. The inferred age of the last common ancestor of the Anopheles genus was ca. 110 Ma. The monophyly of all Anopheles subgenera was supported, although we failed to recover a significant level of statistical support for the monophyly of the Anopheles genus. The ages of the last common ancestors of the Neotropical clade and the Anopheles and Cellia subgenera were inferred to be at the Late Cretaceous (ca. 90 Ma). Our analysis failed to statistically support the monophyly of the Anopheles genus because of an unresolved polytomy between Bironella and A. squamifemur.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic VariationPhylogenyAnimalsAnophelesElectron Transport Complex IVInsect ProteinsMitochondrial ProteinsProtein SubunitsRNA, Ribosomal, 5.8SSpecies SpecificityTime FactorsElectron Transport Complex IVInsect ProteinsMitochondrial ProteinsProtein SubunitsRNA, Ribosomal, 5.8S

Identifiers

PMID26244561
PMCPMC4526650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.