Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26244538›Full record

ReviewObstetrics and gynecology2015

Clinical, Ethical, and Legal Considerations in Pregnant Women With Opioid Abuse.

Mallory E Kremer, Kavita Shah Arora

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Comparing maternal substance use and perinatal outcomes before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Observational
  7. Women-Reported Barriers and Facilitators of Continued Engagement with Medications for Opioid Use Disorder.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The opioid epidemic and neonatal abstinence syndrome in the USA: a review of the continuum of care.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2017
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mallory E KremerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Kavita Shah Arora
Case Western Reserve University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rising prevalence of women with opioid addiction in pregnancy necessitates understanding of medical, ethical, and legal considerations on the part of obstetricians. In addition to briefly reviewing the medical care of opioid abuse in pregnancy, we offer a careful consideration of the stigmatization of addiction and resultant medicolegal sequelae. We advocate for improved access to opioid maintenance therapy and social services as a means of improving healthful pregnancy outcomes and decry recent trends in the criminalization of addiction nationwide.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePregnant PeopleEthics, MedicalEthnicityFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLiability, LegalNeeds AssessmentNeonatal Abstinence SyndromeOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsRisk AssessmentSocial Stigma

Identifiers

PMID26244538
OpenAlexW2333091283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.