Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26244381›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical psychopharmacology2015

Medication Nonadherence, "Professional Subjects," and Apparent Placebo Responders: Overlapping Challenges for Medications Development.

David J McCann, Nancy M Petry, Anders Bresell, Eva Isacsson, Ellis Wilson, Robert C Alexander

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Effects of Varenicline, Depressive Symptoms, and Region of Enrollment on Smoking Cessation in Depressed Smokers.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. (Non-) impact of task experience on behavioral economic decision-making.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Learning from lorcaserin: lessons from the negative clinical trial of lorcaserin to treat cocaine use disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David J McCannFrom the *Division of Pharmacotherapies and Medical Consequences of Drug Abuse, NIDA, NIH, Bethesda, MD; †Calhoun Cardiology Center and Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT; and ‡Innovative Medicines, Neurosciences, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, MA.
Nancy M Petry
Anders Bresell
Eva Isacsson
Ellis Wilson
Robert C Alexander

Funding

Vulnerabilities for coping-related drinking among post-college young adultsP60AA003510 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI BAUER, LANCE O. · 2008 to 2017
$17.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 DA999999NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA003510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonadherence is a major problem in clinical trials of new medications. To evaluate the extent of nonadherence, this study evaluated pharmacokinetic sampling from 1765 subjects receiving active therapy across 8 psychiatric trials conducted between 2001 and 2011. With nonadherence defined as greater than 50% of plasma samples below the limit of quantification for study drug, the percentage of nonadherent subjects ranged from 12.8% to 39.2%. There was a trend toward increased nonadherence in studies with greater numbers of subjects, but an association with nonadherence was not apparent for other study design parameters or subject characteristics. For 2 trials with multiple recruitment sites in geographical proximity, several subjects attempted to simultaneously enroll at separate site locations. The construct of "professional subjects," those who enroll in trials only for financial gain, is gaining attention, and we therefore modeled the impact of professional subjects on medication efficacy trials. The results indicate that enrollment of professional subjects who are destined to succeed (those who will appear to achieve treatment success regardless of study drug assignment) can substantially increase both the apparent placebo response rate and the sample size requirement for statistical power, while decreasing the observed effect size. The overlapping nature of nonadherence, professional subjects, and placebo response suggests that these issues should be considered and addressed together. Following this approach, we describe a novel clinical trial design to minimize the adverse effects of professional subjects on trial outcomes and discuss methods to monitor adherence.

Indexed as

Medication AdherencePlacebo EffectDrug DesignHumansMental DisordersPatient SelectionPharmacokineticsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignResearch SubjectsSample Size

Identifiers

PMID26244381
PMCPMC4553101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.