Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26244058›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2015

Genomic prediction of celiac disease targeting HLA-positive individuals.

Gad Abraham, Alexia Rohmer, Jason A Tye-Din, Michael Inouye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Functional immune profiling reveals CD4Immunology and cell biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Molecular Biomarkers for Celiac Disease: Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  6. Consensus statement from 2Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2020
    Article
  7. Celiac Disease: Against the Grain in Gastroenterology.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gad AbrahamCentre for Systems Genomics, School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010 Victoria Australia ; Medical Systems Biology, Department of Pathology and Department of Microbiology & Immunology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010 Victoria Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4853-0118
Alexia RohmerMedical Systems Biology, Department of Pathology and Department of Microbiology & Immunology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010 Victoria Australia ; Faculty of Life Science, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, 67084 CEDEX France.
Jason A Tye-DinThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, 3052 Victoria Australia ; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010 Victoria Australia ; Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St., Parkville, 3050 Victoria Australia ; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3050 Australia.
Michael InouyeCentre for Systems Genomics, School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010 Victoria Australia ; Medical Systems Biology, Department of Pathology and Department of Microbiology & Immunology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010 Victoria Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic prediction aims to leverage genome-wide genetic data towards better disease diagnostics and risk scores. We have previously published a genomic risk score (GRS) for celiac disease (CD), a common and highly heritable autoimmune disease, which differentiates between CD cases and population-based controls at a clinically-relevant predictive level, improving upon other gene-based approaches. HLA risk haplotypes, particularly HLA-DQ2.5, are necessary but not sufficient for CD, with at least one HLA risk haplotype present in up to half of most Caucasian populations. Here, we assess a genomic prediction strategy that specifically targets this common genetic susceptibility subtype, utilizing a supervised learning procedure for CD that leverages known HLA-DQ2.5 risk.

methodsUsing L1/L2-regularized support-vector machines trained on large European case-control datasets, we constructed novel CD GRSs specific to individuals with HLA-DQ2.5 risk haplotypes (GRS-DQ2.5) and compared them with the predictive power of the existing CD GRS (GRS14) as well as two haplotype-based approaches, externally validating the results in a North American case-control study.

resultsConsistent with previous observations, both the existing GRS14 and the GRS-DQ2.5 had better predictive performance than the HLA haplotype approaches. GRS-DQ2.5 models, based on directly genotyped or imputed markers, achieved similar levels of predictive performance (AUC = 0.718-0.73), which were substantially higher than those obtained from the DQ2.5 zygosity alone (AUC = 0.558), the HLA risk haplotype method (AUC = 0.634), or the generic GRS14 (AUC = 0.679). In a screening model of at-risk individuals, the GRS-DQ2.5 lowered the number of unnecessary follow-up tests for CD across most sensitivity levels. Relative to a baseline implicating all DQ2.5-positive individuals for follow-up, the GRS-DQ2.5 resulted in a net saving of 2.2 unnecessary follow-up tests for each justified test while still capturing 90 % of DQ2.5-positive CD cases.

conclusionsGenomic risk scores for CD that target genetically at-risk sub-groups improve predictive performance beyond traditional approaches and may represent a useful strategy for prioritizing individuals at increased risk of disease, thus potentially reducing unnecessary follow-up diagnostic tests.

Identifiers

PMID26244058
PMCPMC4523954
OpenAlexW2950085315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.