ArticleGenome medicine2015
Genomic prediction of celiac disease targeting HLA-positive individuals.
Article in Genome medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional immune profiling reveals CD4Immunology and cell biology · 2026Article
- The relationship between 11 different polygenic longevity scores, parental lifespan, and disease diagnosis in the UK Biobank.GeroScience · 2024Article
- Construction and Application of Polygenic Risk Scores in Autoimmune Diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Responsible use of polygenic risk scores in the clinic: potential benefits, risks and gaps.Nature medicine · 2021Review
- Molecular Biomarkers for Celiac Disease: Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Consensus statement from 2Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2020Article
- Celiac Disease: Against the Grain in Gastroenterology.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2019Article
- Prevalence of markers of celiac disease in Colombian children with diabetes mellitus type 1.Colombia medica (Cali, Colombia) · 2018Article
- Role of Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA) in Autoimmune Diseases.Rheumatology and therapy · 2018Review
- HLA typing using genome wide data reveals susceptibility types for infections in a psychiatric disease enriched sample.Brain, behavior, and immunity · 2018Article
- Genetic Risk Scores for Type 1 Diabetes Prediction and Diagnosis.Current diabetes reports · 2017Review
- Celiac disease: from etiological factors to evolving diagnostic approaches.Journal of gastroenterology · 2017Review
- Coeliac disease: a unique model for investigating broken tolerance in autoimmunity.Clinical & translational immunology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenomic prediction aims to leverage genome-wide genetic data towards better disease diagnostics and risk scores. We have previously published a genomic risk score (GRS) for celiac disease (CD), a common and highly heritable autoimmune disease, which differentiates between CD cases and population-based controls at a clinically-relevant predictive level, improving upon other gene-based approaches. HLA risk haplotypes, particularly HLA-DQ2.5, are necessary but not sufficient for CD, with at least one HLA risk haplotype present in up to half of most Caucasian populations. Here, we assess a genomic prediction strategy that specifically targets this common genetic susceptibility subtype, utilizing a supervised learning procedure for CD that leverages known HLA-DQ2.5 risk.
methodsUsing L1/L2-regularized support-vector machines trained on large European case-control datasets, we constructed novel CD GRSs specific to individuals with HLA-DQ2.5 risk haplotypes (GRS-DQ2.5) and compared them with the predictive power of the existing CD GRS (GRS14) as well as two haplotype-based approaches, externally validating the results in a North American case-control study.
resultsConsistent with previous observations, both the existing GRS14 and the GRS-DQ2.5 had better predictive performance than the HLA haplotype approaches. GRS-DQ2.5 models, based on directly genotyped or imputed markers, achieved similar levels of predictive performance (AUC = 0.718-0.73), which were substantially higher than those obtained from the DQ2.5 zygosity alone (AUC = 0.558), the HLA risk haplotype method (AUC = 0.634), or the generic GRS14 (AUC = 0.679). In a screening model of at-risk individuals, the GRS-DQ2.5 lowered the number of unnecessary follow-up tests for CD across most sensitivity levels. Relative to a baseline implicating all DQ2.5-positive individuals for follow-up, the GRS-DQ2.5 resulted in a net saving of 2.2 unnecessary follow-up tests for each justified test while still capturing 90 % of DQ2.5-positive CD cases.
conclusionsGenomic risk scores for CD that target genetically at-risk sub-groups improve predictive performance beyond traditional approaches and may represent a useful strategy for prioritizing individuals at increased risk of disease, thus potentially reducing unnecessary follow-up diagnostic tests.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.