Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26244040›Full record

ArticleClinical and molecular allergy : CMA2015

Escaping the trap of allergic rhinitis.

Oliviero Rossi, Ilaria Massaro, Marco Caminati, Cristina Quecchia, Filippo Fassio, Enrico Heffler, Giorgio Walter Canonica

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and molecular allergy : CMA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Allergic Rhinitis and Chronic Daily Headaches: Is There a Link?Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Oliviero RossiAllergy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 1, 50129 Firenze, Italy.
Ilaria Massaro *Denothe Center, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy.
Marco Caminati *Allergy Unit, Verona University and General Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Cristina Quecchia *Allergy Unit, Melegnano Hospital, Melegnano (Milano), Italy and Clinical Pedagogical Laboratory and Biomedical Research, Pediatric Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Filippo Fassio *Medicine Unit, ASL 3 Pistoia, Pistoia, Italy.
Enrico Heffler *Respiratory Medicine and Allergy - Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Giorgio Walter Canonica *Respiratory Diseases & Allergy Clinic, DIMI-Department Internal Medicine, Respiratory Diseases and Allergy Clinic, University of Genoa, IRCCS AOU S. Martino Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
ASST Melegnano e della Martesana · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITOspedale del Ceppo · ITUniversity of Catania · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhinitis is often the first symptom of allergy but is frequently ignored and classified as a nuisance condition. Ironically it has the greatest socioeconomic burden worldwide caused by its impact on work and on daily life. However, patients appear reticent to seek professional advice, visiting their doctor only when symptoms become 'intolerable' and often when their usual therapy proves ineffective. Clearly, it's time for new and more effective allergic rhinitis treatments. MP29-02 (Dymista®; Meda, Solna, Sweden) is a new class of medication for moderate to severe seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis if monotherapy with either intranasal antihistamine or intranasal corticosteroids is not considered sufficient. MP29-02 is a novel formulation of azelastine hydrochloride (AZE) and fluticasone propionate (FP). It benefits not only from the incorporation of two active agents, but also from a novel formulation; its lower viscosity, smaller droplet size, larger volume (137 μl) and wider spray angle ensure optimal coverage of, and retention on the nasal mucosa and contribute to its clinical efficacy. In clinical trials, patients treated with MP29-02 experienced twice the symptom relief as those treated with FP and AZE, who in turn exhibited significantly greater symptom relief than placebo-patients. Indeed, the advantage of MP29-02 over FP was approximately the same as that shown for FP over placebo. The advantage of MP29-02 was particularly evident in those patients for whom nasal congestion is predominant, with MP29-02 providing three times the nasal congestion relief of FP (p = 0.0018) and five times the relief of AZE (p = 0.0001). Moreover, patients treated with MP29-02 achieved each and every response up to a week faster than those treated with FP or AZE alone and in real life 1 in 2 patients reported the perception of well-controlled disease after only 3 days. MP29-02's superiority over FP was also apparent long-term in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis or non-allergic rhinitis, with statistical significance noted from the first day of treatment, with treatment difference maintained for a full year. Taken together, these data suggest that MP29-02 may improve the lives of many of our patients, enabling them to finally escape the allergic rhinitis trap.

Indexed as

Allergic rhinitisIntranasal antihistaminesIntranasal corticosteroidsTherapy

Identifiers

PMID26244040
PMCPMC4524393
OpenAlexW1848413011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.