Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26243877›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Heterochrony underpins natural variation in Cardamine hirsuta leaf form.

Maria Cartolano, Bjorn Pieper, Janne Lempe, Alex Tattersall, Peter Huijser, Achim Tresch, Peter R Darrah, Angela Hay, Miltos Tsiantis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Heterochronic shifts in a timing-keeping microRNA are associated with multiple instances of neoteny in plants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evolutionary Dynamics ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Leaf Development inGenes · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Plant science's next top models.Annals of botany · 2020
    Review
  14. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Mutagenesis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. The role ofeLife · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maria CartolanoDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Cologne, Germany;
Bjorn PieperDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Cologne, Germany;
Janne LempeDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Cologne, Germany;
Alex TattersallDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RB, United Kingdom;
Peter HuijserDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Cologne, Germany;
Achim TreschBotanical Institute, University of Cologne, 50647 Cologne, Germany; Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Cologne, Germany.
Peter R DarrahDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RB, United Kingdom;
Angela HayDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Cologne, Germany;
Miltos TsiantisDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Cologne, Germany; tsiantis@mpipz.mpg.de.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H006974/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H011455/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key problem in biology is whether the same processes underlie morphological variation between and within species. Here, by using plant leaves as an example, we show that the causes of diversity at these two evolutionary scales can be divergent. Some species like the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana have simple leaves, whereas others like the A. thaliana relative Cardamine hirsuta bear complex leaves comprising leaflets. Previous work has shown that these interspecific differences result mostly from variation in local tissue growth and patterning. Now, by cloning and characterizing a quantitative trait locus (QTL) for C. hirsuta leaf shape, we find that a different process, age-dependent progression of leaf form, underlies variation in this trait within species. This QTL effect is caused by cis-regulatory variation in the floral repressor ChFLC, such that genotypes with low-expressing ChFLC alleles show both early flowering and accelerated age-dependent changes in leaf form, including faster leaflet production. We provide evidence that this mechanism coordinates leaf development with reproductive timing and may help to optimize resource allocation to the next generation.

Indexed as

Quantitative Trait LociAllelesArabidopsisBase SequenceBiodiversityCardamineChromosome MappingCloning, MolecularFlowersGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenotypeLightModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataPhenotypePlant LeavesCardamine hirsutacompound leafFlowering Locus Cheterochronynatural variation

Identifiers

PMID26243877
PMCPMC4547220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.