Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26243862›Full record

ArticleCancer discovery2015

MET receptor juxtamembrane exon 14 alternative spliced variant: novel cancer genomic predictive biomarker.

Patrick C Ma

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer discovery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Has programmed cell death ligand-1Translational lung cancer research · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. (Not Giving Up) The Marathon Race of MET Targeting Therapy: Are We There Yet?Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Special issue: "MET as actionable target in cancer therapy".Annals of translational medicine · 2017
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Patrick C MaMary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia. West Virginia Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia. pcma@hsc.wvu.edu.

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Laura F. Gibson · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942NIGMS NIH HHS U54GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical studies on MET-targeting cancer therapeutics have yielded mixed results in recent years, and MET-relevant predictive biomarkers remain elusive. New studies now reveal METex14 alternative splicing aberrations to represent potential predictive cancer genomic biomarker, hence renewing optimism and directions in the quest for optimized MET-targeting personalized cancer therapy.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingExonsMutationAdenocarcinomaAntineoplastic AgentsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleNeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metAntineoplastic AgentsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-met

Identifiers

PMID26243862
PMCPMC4617658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.