Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26243365›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2016

Prospective study of predictive factors of changes in pain and hip function after hip fracture among the elderly.

M Orive, A Anton-Ladislao, S García-Gutiérrez, C Las Hayas, N González, J Zabala, J M Quintana

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Orthogeriatric Management: Improvements in Outcomes during Hospital Admission Due to Hip Fracture.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M OriveResearch Unit, Galdakao-Usansolo Hospital, Barrio Labeaga, s/n, 48960, Usansolo, Bizkaia, Spain. miren.orivecalzada@osakidetza.eus.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1848-6638
A Anton-LadislaoResearch Unit, Galdakao-Usansolo Hospital, Barrio Labeaga, s/n, 48960, Usansolo, Bizkaia, Spain.
S García-GutiérrezResearch Unit, Galdakao-Usansolo Hospital, Barrio Labeaga, s/n, 48960, Usansolo, Bizkaia, Spain.
C Las HayasPsychology Department of Personality, Assessment and Treatment, University of Deusto, Bilbao, 48007, Bizkaia, Spain.
N GonzálezResearch Unit, Galdakao-Usansolo Hospital, Barrio Labeaga, s/n, 48960, Usansolo, Bizkaia, Spain.
J ZabalaTraumatology Service, Galdakao-Usansolo Hospital, Galdakao, 48960, Bizkaia, Spain.
J M QuintanaResearch Unit, Galdakao-Usansolo Hospital, Barrio Labeaga, s/n, 48960, Usansolo, Bizkaia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledOur study identified pre-fracture variables, such as home status or function, that are directly or indirectly associated with frailty status before fracture. The prevention in the deterioration of those variables would improve the prognosis of those hip fractured, being this an important issue for the societies with increasingly aging population.

introductionThis study was designed to identify predictors of pain and declines in function among elderly patients following a fall-related hip fracture.

methodsPatients aged 65 or older with a fall-related hip fracture retrospectively completed pre-fracture status questionnaires (T0; n = 740) and were then prospectively followed for 6 months (T1; n = 546). Of these, 474 were randomly selected to complete an additional 18 months of follow-up (T2; n = 356). Primary outcome measures were changes in the pain and function dimensions of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire's short form (WOMAC-SF). Potential predictors included sociodemographic variables, in-hospital and clinical pre- and post-fracture data, and activities of daily living at baseline and follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression was used for analysis.

resultsPredictors of worsening pain at T1 and/or T2 included living in a home care situation or nursing home before the fracture (OR at T1, 1.515; OR at T2, 2.749), and low pre-fracture pain (OR at T1, 1.028; OR at T2, 1.027). Predictors of deterioration in function at T1 and/or T2 included age ≥85 years (OR at T1, 2.714; OR at T2, 4.762), lower income (OR at T1, 1.755), high pre-fracture hip function (OR at T1, 1.029; OR at T2, 1.028), referral to rehabilitation upon discharge (OR at T1, 2.378; OR at T2, 2.881), and longer delay between fall and surgery (OR at T1, 1.133; OR at T2, 1.124).

conclusionsFrailty before hip fracture is a predictor of greater post-fracture pain and deterioration in function. Given that exercise programs help prevent frailty, promoting exercise in elderly may improve the prognosis of hip fracture.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFrail ElderlyGeriatric AssessmentHip FracturesHip JointHumansMalePainPain MeasurementPrognosisFunctionHip fracturePainPredictorsWOMAC-SF

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.