ArticleClinical and translational science2015
Dissemination, Implementation, and Improvement Science Research in Population Health: Opportunities for Public Health and CTSAs.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building capacity and advancing collaboration in dissemination and implementation science: insights from a multi-institutional partner network.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Beyond Finding Purpose: Motivating a Translational Science of Purpose Acquisition.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Pantry clients and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education practitioners' perspectives on factors influencing healthy eating policy, system and environmental interventions in food pantries.Journal of nutritional science · 2023Article
- Use of Community Listening Sessions to Disseminate Research Findings to Past Participants and Communities.Journal of community health · 2022Article
- Cross fertilisation of Public Health and Translational Research.Journal of the Indian Institute of Science · 2022Review
- Training researchers in dissemination of study results to research participants and communities.Translational behavioral medicine · 2021Article
- Engagement of community stakeholders to develop a framework to guide research dissemination to communities.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020Article
- Leveraging Community Engaged Policy, Systems, and Environmental (PSE) Approaches to Foster Healthy Eating in the United States.Journal of healthy eating and active living · 2020Article
- Behavioral and Social Sciences at the National Institutes of Health: adoption of research findings in health research and practice as a scientific priority.Translational behavioral medicine · 2017Article
- Engaging the Community in the Dissemination, Implementation, and Improvement of Health-Related Research.Clinical and translational science · 2015Article
- Enhancing Dissemination, Implementation, and Improvement Science in CTSAs through Regional Partnerships.Clinical and translational science · 2015Article
- A Practice-Grounded Approach for Evaluating Health in All Policies Initiatives in the United States.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceThe complex, dynamic nature of health systems requires dissemination, implementation, and improvement (DII) sciences to effectively translate emerging knowledge into practice. Although they hold great promise for informing multisector policies and system-level changes, these methods are often not strategically used by public health. OBJECTIVES AND
methodsMore than 120 stakeholders from Southern California, including the community, federal and local government, university, and health services were convened to identify key priorities and opportunities for public health departments and Clinical and Translational Science Awards programs (CTSAs) to advance DII sciences in population health. MAIN OUTCOMES: Participants identified challenges (mismatch of practice realities with narrowly focused research questions; lack of iterative learning) and solutions (using methods that fit the dynamic nature of the real world; aligning theories of change across sectors) for applying DII science research to public health problems. Pragmatic steps that public health and CTSAs can take to facilitate DII science research include: employing appropriate study designs; training scientists and practicing professionals in these methods; securing resources to advance this work; and supporting team science to solve complex-systems issues.
conclusionsPublic health and CTSAs represent a unique model of practice for advancing DII research in population health. The partnership can inform policy and program development in local communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.