Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26243257›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2015

OrthoFinder: solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves orthogroup inference accuracy.

David M Emms, Steven Kelly

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,999 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,999citing papers in PubMed
68.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,999 citing papers in PubMed, 3,870 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reverse vaccinology for development of vaccine against Aeromonas hydrophila infection in nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1,939 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David M EmmsDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3RB, UK. david.emms@plants.ox.ac.uk.
Steven KellyDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3RB, UK. steven.kelly@plants.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying homology relationships between sequences is fundamental to biological research. Here we provide a novel orthogroup inference algorithm called OrthoFinder that solves a previously undetected gene length bias in orthogroup inference, resulting in significant improvements in accuracy. Using real benchmark datasets we demonstrate that OrthoFinder is more accurate than other orthogroup inference methods by between 8 % and 33 %. Furthermore, we demonstrate the utility of OrthoFinder by providing a complete classification of transcription factor gene families in plants revealing 6.9 million previously unobserved relationships.

Indexed as

Multigene FamilySoftwareAlgorithmsGenes, PlantGenomicsPhylogenyProteinsTranscription FactorsProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID26243257
PMCPMC4531804
OpenAlexW1900937478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.