Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26243137›Full record

ArticleHeredity2016

Genomic diversity and differentiation of a managed island wild boar population.

L Iacolina, M Scandura, D J Goedbloed, P Alexandri, R P M A Crooijmans, G Larson, A Archibald, M Apollonio, L B Schook, M A M Groenen and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

L IacolinaDepartment of Science for Nature and Environmental Resources, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
M ScanduraDepartment of Science for Nature and Environmental Resources, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
D J GoedbloedBraunschweig, Zoological Institute, Braunschweig, Germany.
P AlexandriWageningen University, Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
R P M A CrooijmansWageningen University, Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
G LarsonDurham Evolution and Ancient DNA, Durham University, Department of Archaeology, Durham, UK.
A ArchibaldThe Roslin Institute, R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Division of Genetics and Genomics, Midlothian, UK.
M ApollonioDepartment of Science for Nature and Environmental Resources, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
L B SchookUniversity of Illinois, Laboratory of Comparative Genomics, Urbana, IL, USA.
M A M GroenenWageningen University, Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
H-J MegensWageningen University, Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
University of Sassari · ITWageningen University & Research · NLAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211550Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of island populations in natural systems is driven by local adaptation and genetic drift. However, evolutionary pathways may be altered by humans in several ways. The wild boar (WB) (Sus scrofa) is an iconic game species occurring in several islands, where it has been strongly managed since prehistoric times. We examined genomic diversity at 49 803 single-nucleotide polymorphisms in 99 Sardinian WBs and compared them with 196 wild specimens from mainland Europe and 105 domestic pigs (DP; 11 breeds). High levels of genetic variation were observed in Sardinia (80.9% of the total number of polymorphisms), which can be only in part associated to recent genetic introgression. Both Principal Component Analysis and Bayesian clustering approach revealed that the Sardinian WB population is highly differentiated from the other European populations (FST=0.126-0.138), and from DP (FST=0.169). Such evidences were mostly unaffected by an uneven sample size, although clustering results in reference populations changed when the number of individuals was standardized. Runs of homozygosity (ROHs) pattern and distribution in Sardinian WB are consistent with a past expansion following a bottleneck (small ROHs) and recent population substructuring (highly homozygous individuals). The observed effect of a non-random selection of Sardinian individuals on diversity, FST and ROH estimates, stressed the importance of sampling design in the study of structured or introgressed populations. Our results support the heterogeneity and distinctiveness of the Sardinian population and prompt further investigations on its origins and conservation status.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsBayes TheoremEuropeGenotypeIslandsItalyPrincipal Component AnalysisSequence Analysis, DNASus scrofa

Identifiers

PMID26243137
PMCPMC4675874
OpenAlexW1863380383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.