ArticleBMC health services research2015
Empowering patients through eHealth: a case report of a pan-European project.
Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Benefits and Harms of Digital Health Interventions Promoting Physical Activity in People With Chronic Conditions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Physical and Psychological Effects of Home-Based vs Face-to-Face Prehabilitation in Individuals With Severe Obesity Awaiting Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Clinical Digital Health Engagement and Psychological Distress Among Adults.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Enterprise-led internet healthcare provision in China: insights from a leading platform.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- [Utility of theRevista espanola de salud publica · 2023Article
- Preferences of Patients With Musculoskeletal Disorders Regarding the Timing and Channel of eHealth and Factors Influencing Its Use: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- Mobile 5P-Medicine Approach for Cardiovascular Patients.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Limits of Empowerment: How to Reframe the Role of mHealth Tools in the Healthcare Ecosystem.Science and engineering ethics · 2020Article
- Integrated Care Programs for People with Multimorbidity in European Countries: eHealth Adoption in Health Systems.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- Defining Empowerment and Supporting Engagement Using Patient Views From the Citizen Health Information Portal: Qualitative Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2018Article
- eHealth as the Next-Generation Perinatal Care: An Overview of the Literature.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Review
- Patterns of computer and Internet use and its association with HIV knowledge in selected countries in sub-Saharan Africa.PloS one · 2018Article
- [Telehealth as state response strategy: systematic reviewLa telesalud como estrategia de respuesta del Estado: revisión sistemática].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2018Review
- eHealth for people with multimorbidity: Results from the ICARE4EU project and insights from the "10 e's" by Gunther Eysenbach.PloS one · 2018Article
- Evaluating Patient Empowerment in Association With eHealth Technology: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Article
- Taking mHealth Forward: Examining the Core Characteristics.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2016Article
- Review
- Technology scripts in care practice: A case study of assistant nurses' use of a social alarm system in Swedish nursing homes.Digital healthArticle
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis paper crystallises the experience developed by the pan-European PALANTE Consortium in dealing with the generation of relevant evidence from heterogeneous eHealth services for patient empowerment in nine European Regions. The European Commission (EC) recently funded a number of pan-European eHealth projects aimed at empowering European patients/citizens thus transforming the traditional patient/citizen role in the management of their health (e.g., PALANTE, SUSTAIN, CARRE, HeartCycle, Empower). However, the heterogeneity of the healthcare systems, of the implemented services and of the target patients, the use of ad-hoc definitions of the salient concepts and the development of small-size experiences have prevented the dissemination of "global" results and the development of cumulative knowledge. The main challenge has been the generation of large-scale evidence from heterogeneous small-size experiences. DISCUSSION: Three lessons have been collectively learnt during the development of the PALANTE project, which involves 9 sites that have implemented different eHealth services for empowering different typologies of patients. These lessons have been refined progressively through project meetings, reviews with the EC Project Officer and Reviewers. The paper illustrates the ten steps followed to develop the three lessons. The first lesson learnt is about how EC-funded projects should develop cumulative knowledge by avoiding self-crafted measures of outcome and by adopting literature-grounded definitions and scales. The second lesson learnt is about how EC-funded projects should identify ambitious, cross-pilot policy and research questions that allow pooling of data from across heterogeneous experiences even if a multi-centre study design was not agreed before. The third lesson learnt is about how EC-funded projects should open their collections of data and make them freely-accessible to the scientific community shortly after the conclusion of the project in order to guarantee the replicability of results and conclusions. SUMMARY: The three lessons might provide original elements for fuelling the ongoing debate about the capability of the EC to develop evidence-based policies by pooling evidence from heterogeneous, local experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.