Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26242810›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2015

The impact of pediatric-specific dose modulation curves on radiation dose and image quality in head computed tomography.

Joana Santos, Shane Foley, Graciano Paulo, Mark F McEntee, Louise Rainford

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Virtual modeling, stereolithography, and intraoperative CT guidance for the optimization of sagittal synostosis reconstruction: a technical note.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joana SantosInstituto Politécnico de Coimbra, ESTESC, DMIR, Rua 5 de Outubro, S. Martinho do Bispo, 3046-854, Coimbra, Portugal. joanasantos@estescoimbra.pt.
Shane FoleySchool of Medicine & Medical Science, Health Science Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Graciano PauloInstituto Politécnico de Coimbra, ESTESC, DMIR, Rua 5 de Outubro, S. Martinho do Bispo, 3046-854, Coimbra, Portugal.
Mark F McEnteeFaculty of Health Sciences, Cumberland Campus, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Louise RainfordSchool of Medicine & Medical Science, Health Science Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe volume of CT examinations has increased with resultant increases in collective dose values over the last decade.

objectiveTo analyze the impact of the tube current and voltage modulation for dose values and image quality of pediatric head CT examinations. MATERIALS AND

methodsHead CT examinations were performed on anthropomorphic phantoms and four pediatric age categories before and after the introduction of dedicated pediatric curves for tube voltage and current modulation. Local diagnostic reference levels were calculated. Visual grading characteristic image quality evaluation was performed by four pediatric neuroradiologists and image noise comparisons were performed.

resultsPediatric-specific modulation curves demonstrated a 49% decrease in mean radiation dose for phantom examinations. The local diagnostic reference levels (CTDIvol) for clinical examinations decreased by 52%, 41%, 46% and 40% for newborn, 5-, 10- and 15-year-old patients, respectively. Visual grading characteristic image quality was maintained for the majority of age categorizations (area under the curve = 0.5) and image noise measurements did not change (P = 0.693).

conclusionPediatric-specific dose modulation curves resulted in an overall mean dose reduction of 45% with no significant differences in subjective or objective image quality findings.

Indexed as

Phantoms, ImagingRadiation DosageAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHeadHumansInfantInfant, NewbornRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedChildComputed tomographyHeadRadiation dose reduction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.