Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26242732›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2015

L-type Calcium Channel Cav1.2 Is Required for Maintenance of Auditory Brainstem Nuclei.

Lena Ebbers, Somisetty V Satheesh, Katrin Janz, Lukas Rüttiger, Maren Blosa, Franz Hofmann, Markus Morawski, Désirée Griesemer, Marlies Knipper, Eckhard Friauf and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lena EbbersFrom the Neurogenetics Group, Center of Excellence Hearing4All, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany.
Somisetty V SatheeshFrom the Neurogenetics Group, Center of Excellence Hearing4All, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany.
Katrin Janzthe Animal Physiology Group, Department of Biology, University of Kaiserlautern, P. O. Box 3049, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Lukas Rüttigerthe Department of Otolaryngology, Hearing Research Centre Tübingen (THRC), Molecular Physiology of Hearing, University of Tübingen, Elfriede Aulhorn Strasse 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Maren Blosathe Paul Flechsig Institute of Brain Research, Faculty of Medicine, University Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 19, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Franz Hofmannthe Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Technische Universität, Biedersteiner Strasse 29, D-80802 München, and.
Markus Morawskithe Paul Flechsig Institute of Brain Research, Faculty of Medicine, University Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 19, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Désirée Griesemerthe Animal Physiology Group, Department of Biology, University of Kaiserlautern, P. O. Box 3049, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Marlies Knipperthe Department of Otolaryngology, Hearing Research Centre Tübingen (THRC), Molecular Physiology of Hearing, University of Tübingen, Elfriede Aulhorn Strasse 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Eckhard Friaufthe Animal Physiology Group, Department of Biology, University of Kaiserlautern, P. O. Box 3049, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Hans Gerd NothwangFrom the Neurogenetics Group, Center of Excellence Hearing4All, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany, the Research Center for Neurosensory Science, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany hans.g.nothwang@uni-oldenburg.de.
Hearing4all · DEUniversity of Kaiserslautern · DELeipzig University · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cav1.2 and Cav1.3 are the major L-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels in the CNS. Yet, their individual in vivo functions are largely unknown. Both channel subunits are expressed in the auditory brainstem, where Cav1.3 is essential for proper maturation. Here, we investigated the role of Cav1.2 by targeted deletion in the mouse embryonic auditory brainstem. Similar to Cav1.3, loss of Cav1.2 resulted in a significant decrease in the volume and cell number of auditory nuclei. Contrary to the deletion of Cav1.3, the action potentials of lateral superior olive (LSO) neurons were narrower compared with controls, whereas the firing behavior and neurotransmission appeared unchanged. Furthermore, auditory brainstem responses were nearly normal in mice lacking Cav1.2. Perineuronal nets were also unaffected. The medial nucleus of the trapezoid body underwent a rapid cell loss between postnatal days P0 and P4, shortly after circuit formation. Phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB), nuclear NFATc4, and the expression levels of p75NTR, Fas, and FasL did not correlate with cell death. These data demonstrate for the first time that both Cav1.2 and Cav1.3 are necessary for neuronal survival but are differentially required for the biophysical properties of neurons. Thus, they perform common as well as distinct functions in the same tissue.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAuditory PathwaysBrain StemCalcium Channels, L-TypeCell DeathExtracellular MatrixMiceCACNA1C protein, mouseCalcium Channels, L-Typeapoptosiscalcium channelmouseneuronsignal transduction

Identifiers

PMID26242732
PMCPMC4583033
OpenAlexW2270042788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.