Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26242565›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2016

Enacting corporate governance of healthcare safety and quality: a dramaturgy of hospital boards in England.

Tim Freeman, Ross Millar, Russell Mannion, Huw Davies

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice.International journal of health policy and management · 2017
    Article
  7. Do Hospital Boards matter for better, safer, patient care?Social science & medicine (1982) · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tim FreemanLeadership, Work and Organisation, Middlesex University, UK.
Ross MillarHealth Services Management Centre, Birmingham, UK.
Russell MannionHealth Services Management Centre, Birmingham, UK.
Huw DaviesSchool of Management, University of St. Andrews, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 10/1007/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The governance of patient safety is a challenging concern for all health systems. Yet, while the role of executive boards receives increased scrutiny, the area remains theoretically and methodologically underdeveloped. Specifically, we lack a detailed understanding of the performative aspects at play: what board members say and do to discharge their accountabilities for patient safety. This article draws on qualitative data from overt non-participant observation of four NHS hospital Foundation Trust boards in England. Applying a dramaturgical framework to explore scripting, setting, staging and performance, we found important differences between case study sites in the performative dimensions of processing and interpretation of infection control data. We detail the practices associated with these differences--the legitimation of current performance, the querying of data classification, and the naming and shaming of executives--to consider their implications.

Indexed as

EnglandGoverning BoardHospital AdministrationHumansPatient SafetyQuality of Health CareSafetySociology, MedicalState MedicinegovernanceNational Health Service (NHS)safety

Identifiers

PMID26242565
PMCPMC5014173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.