Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26242546›Full record

ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2015

[Augmentation techniques on the proximal femur].

C Neuerburg, M Gosch, M Blauth, W Böcker, C Kammerlander

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cement augmentation of the proximal femur nail antirotation: is it safe?Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C NeuerburgKlinik für Allgemeine, Unfall-, Hand- und Plastische Chirurgie, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Nußbaumstr. 20, 80336, München, Deutschland, carl.neuerburg@med.uni-muenchen.de.
M Gosch
M Blauth
W Böcker
C Kammerlander
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DENuremberg Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the demographic change fractures of the proximal femur are an increasing major healthcare problem and are associated with the highest mortality among frailty fractures.

objectivesThese mainly osteoporosis-associated fractures of the hip often represent a surgical challenge and the outcome has a decisive influence on the preservation of function and independency of orthogeriatric patients. Augmentation techniques could improve the stability of osteosynthesis in proximal femoral fractures.

methodsCement augmentation of proximal femoral nailing (PFNA) for the treatment of pertrochanteric femoral fractures is the most commonly used and standardized method of augmentation for these fractures by which a safer condition for immediate full weight bearing and mobilization can be achieved.

resultsIn biomechanical and clinical studies good fracture healing was shown and there was no evidence of cement-associated complications in augmented PFNA nailing. In the majority of patients the mobility level prior to trauma could be achieved.

conclusionIn addition to the optimal surgical treatment, secondary prevention such as osteoporosis management to avoid further fractures is crucial in the treatment of these patients. This article is based on the current literature and provides an overview of the possible applications of cement augmentation for the treatment of proximal femoral fractures. In addition the surgical approach as well as previous scientific data on an established osteosynthesis using cement-augmented PFNA for the treatment of pertrochanteric frailty fractures are presented.

Indexed as

Bone CementsCementoplastyCombined Modality TherapyFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, BoneHip FracturesHumansOsteoporotic FracturesPlastic Surgery ProceduresBone Cements

Identifiers

PMID26242546
OpenAlexW2168742505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.