ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2016
Genomic Testing: a Genetic Counselor's Personal Reflection on Three Years of Consenting and Testing.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of patient education videos on genetic counseling outcomes after exome sequencing.Patient education and counseling · 2020Trial
- Understanding what drives genetic study participation: Perspectives of patients, carers, and relatives.Pulmonary circulation · 2024Article
- Addressing ethical issues related to prenatal diagnostic procedures.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2023Article
- Public engagement with genomic medicine: a summary of town hall discussions.Journal of community genetics · 2021Article
- Consent for clinical genome sequencing: considerations from the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.Personalized medicine · 2019Article
- Genetic Counseling in the Era of Genomics: What's all the Fuss about?Journal of genetic counseling · 2018Article
- Operationalizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice: a Framework for the Scalable Delivery of Genomic Counseling and Testing.Journal of genetic counseling · 2018Article
- A Key Role for the Genetic Counsellor in the Genomics Era.F1000Research · 2018Article
- DECIDE: a Decision Support Tool to Facilitate Parents' Choices Regarding Genome-Wide Sequencing.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- Known unknowns: building an ethics of uncertainty into genomic medicine.BMC medical genomics · 2016Article
- Time Flies: an Examination of Genetic Counselor Professional Development: Introduction to Special Issue on Genetic Counselor Development.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Whole exome sequencing (WES) is increasingly used in research and clinical genetics as the cost of sequencing decreases and the interpretation improves. Genetic counselors need to be prepared to counsel a diverse patient population for this complex test. This commentary is a reflection of one genetic counselor's experiences in counseling, consenting, and returning results for clinical and research WES for over 120 participants and patients. She reflects on how she overcame the initial challenges and concerns of counseling for WES and how her counseling evolved from a teaching based counseling model to an interactive patient-center counseling model. Her insights are offered to prepare other genetic counselors for the growing use of genomic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.