Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26242401›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

Virtual restorative environment therapy as an adjunct to pain control during burn dressing changes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Charlotte Small, Robert Stone, Jane Pilsbury, Michael Bowden, Julian Bion

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Virtual reality distraction for acute pain in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Virtual Reality to Improve the Experience of the Mohs Patient-A Prospective Interventional Study.Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte SmallSchool of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, The Medical School, Vincent Drive, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. c.l.flutter@talk21.com.
Robert StoneSchool of Electronic, Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. r.j.stone@bham.ac.uk.
Jane PilsburyAnaesthetic Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, B15 2WB, UK. janepilsbury@hotmail.com.
Michael BowdenAnaesthetic Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, B15 2WB, UK. michael.bowden@uhb.nhs.uk.
Julian BionThe Medical School, Vincent Drive, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. j.f.bion@bham.ac.uk.
University of Birmingham · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pain of a severe burn injury is often characterised by intense background pain, coupled with severe exacerbations associated with essential procedures such as dressing changes. The experience of pain is affected by patients' psychological state and can be enhanced by the anxiety, fear and distress caused by environmental and visual inputs. Virtual Reality (VR) distraction has been used with success in areas such as burns, paediatrics and oncology. The underlying principle of VR is that attention is diverted from the painful stimulus by the use of engaging, dynamic 3D visual content and associated auditory stimuli. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies undertaken during VR distraction from experimental pain have demonstrated enhancement of the descending cortical pain-control system. METHODS/

designThe present study will evaluate the feasibility of introducing a novel VR system to the Burns Unit at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham for dressing changes: virtual restorative environment therapy (VRET). The study will also explore the system's impact on pain during and after the dressing changes compared to conventional analgesia for ward-based burn dressing changes. A within-subject crossover design will be used to compare the following three conditions: 1. Interactive VRET plus conventional analgesics. 2. Passive VRET with conventional analgesics. 3. Conventional analgesics alone. Using the Monte Carlo method, and on the basis of previous local audit data, a sample size of 25 will detect a clinically significant 33 % reduction in worst pain scores experienced during dressing changes. DISCUSSION: The study accrual rate is currently slower than predicted by previous audits of admission data. A review of the screening log has found that recruitment has been limited by the nature of burn care, the ability of burn inpatients to provide informed consent and the ability of patients to use the VR equipment. Prior to the introduction of novel interactive technologies for patient use, the characteristics and capabilities of the target population needs to be evaluated, to ensure that the interface devices and simulations are usable.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN23330756 . Date of Registration 25 February 2014.

Indexed as

BandagesAnalgesicsBurnsBurn UnitsClinical ProtocolsCombined Modality TherapyComputersCross-Over StudiesEnglandFeasibility StudiesHumansInjury Severity ScoreMonte Carlo MethodPainPain ManagementPain MeasurementAnalgesics

Identifiers

PMID26242401
PMCPMC4526294
OpenAlexW2111140458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.