ArticlePloS one2015
Partial Loss of Genomic Imprinting Reveals Important Roles for Kcnq1 and Peg10 Imprinted Domains in Placental Development.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- CRISPR-Cas9-induced double-strand breaks disrupt maintenance of epigenetic information.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Epigenetics in evolution and adaptation to environmental challenges: pathways for disease prevention and treatment.Epigenomics · 2025Review
- Methylation alterations of imprinted genes in different placental diseases.Clinical epigenetics · 2024Article
- Disruption of maternal vascular remodeling by a fetal endoretrovirus-derived gene in preeclampsia.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Assessment of Severity of Long QT Syndrome Phenotype and Risk of Fetal Death.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- The inter- and multi- generational epigenetic alterations induced by maternal cadmium exposure.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
- Transposable elements shape the evolution of mammalian development.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2021Review
- Role of genomic imprinting in mammalian development.Journal of biosciences · 2020Review
- Article
- DNA methylation in blood from neonatal screening cards and the association with BMI and insulin sensitivity in early childhood.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2018Article
- Co-option of endogenous viral sequences for host cell function.Current opinion in virology · 2017Review
- PEG10 overexpression induced by E2F-1 promotes cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in pancreatic cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mutations in imprinted genes or their imprint control regions (ICRs) produce changes in imprinted gene expression and distinct abnormalities in placental structure, indicating the importance of genomic imprinting to placental development. We have recently shown that a very broad spectrum of placental abnormalities associated with altered imprinted gene expression occurs in the absence of the oocyte-derived DNMT1o cytosine methyltransferase, which normally maintains parent-specific imprinted methylation during preimplantation. The absence of DNMT1o partially reduces inherited imprinted methylation while retaining the genetic integrity of imprinted genes and their ICRs. Using this novel system, we undertook a broad and inclusive approach to identifying key ICRs involved in placental development by correlating loss of imprinted DNA methylation with abnormal placental phenotypes in a mid-gestation window (E12.5-E15.5). To these ends we measured DNA CpG methylation at 15 imprinted gametic differentially methylated domains (gDMDs) that overlap known ICRs using EpiTYPER-mass array technology, and linked these epigenetic measurements to histomorphological defects. Methylation of some imprinted gDMDs, most notably Dlk1, was nearly normal in mid-gestation DNMT1o-deficient placentas, consistent with the notion that cells having lost methylation on these DMDs do not contribute significantly to placental development. Most imprinted gDMDs however showed a wide range of methylation loss among DNMT1o-deficient placentas. Two striking associations were observed. First, loss of DNA methylation at the Peg10 imprinted gDMD associated with decreased embryonic viability and decreased labyrinthine volume. Second, loss of methylation at the Kcnq1 imprinted gDMD was strongly associated with trophoblast giant cell (TGC) expansion. We conclude that the Peg10 and Kcnq1 ICRs are key regulators of mid-gestation placental function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.