Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26241507›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2015

Antibiotics and the developing infant gut microbiota and resistome.

Molly K Gibson, Terence S Crofts, Gautam Dantas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Impact of a Purified Microbiome Therapeutic on Abundance of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Patients With Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The advantages ofFuture microbiology · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Critical Role ofReviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Molly K GibsonCenter for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Terence S CroftsCenter for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA; Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Gautam DantasCenter for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA; Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: dantas@wustl.edu.

Funding

METAGENOMIC ENGINEERING OF PROBIOTIC BACTERIA TO IMPROVE INTESTINAL COLONIZATIONDP2DK098089 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DANTAS, GAUTAM · 2012 to 2012
$2.1M
Training in Reproductive SciencesT32HD049305 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MOLEY, KELLE H · 2005 to 2015
$1.9M
ESTABLISHMENT AND DYNAMICS OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE RESERVOIRS IN DEVELOPING INTER01GM099538 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DANTAS, GAUTAM · 2013 to 2016
$1.2M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD049305NIDDK NIH HHS DP2 DK098089NIDDK NIH HHS DP2-DK-098089NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099538NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM099538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbial communities colonizing the human gut are tremendously diverse and highly personal. The composition and function of the microbiota play important roles in human health and disease, and considerable research has focused on understanding the ecological forces shaping these communities. While it is clear that factors such as diet, genotype of the host, and environment influence the adult gut microbiota community composition, recent work has emphasized the importance of early-life assembly dynamics in both the immediate and long-term personalized nature of the gut microbiota. While the mature adult gut microbiota is believed to be relatively stable, the developing infant gut microbiota (IGM) is highly dynamic and prone to disruption by external factors, including antibiotic exposure. Studies have revealed both transient and persistent alterations to the adult gut microbiota community resulting from antibiotic treatment later in life. As antibiotics are routinely prescribed at a greater rate in the first years of life, the impact of these interventions on the developing IGM is emerging as a key research priority. In addition to understanding the impact of these disruptions on the infant gut microbial architecture and related host diseases, we need to understand the contribution of early life antibiotics to the selection of antibiotic resistance gene reservoirs in the microbiota, and their threat to successful treatment of infectious disease. Here we review the current understanding of the developmental progression of the IGM and the impact of antibiotic therapies on its composition and encoded reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, MicrobialGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGenes, BacterialHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Very Low Birth WeightMetagenomicsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26241507
PMCPMC4659777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.